0
Misunderstandings about the Tunguska event, shock wave physics, and airbursts have resulted in misinterpretations of evidence at Tall el-Hammam
Mark Boslough, Andy Bruno, 2025. Scientific Reports 15, 13869.
An airburst physicist's critique of how the Tall el-Hammam paper used the Tunguska analogy and shock physics.
What it's used for here
Background on airburst physics as applied by the proponents.
The document 3 pages
Cited by on this site 1 record
The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Boslough, M., & Bruno, A. (2025). Misunderstandings about the Tunguska event, shock wave physics, and airbursts have resulted in misinterpretations of evidence at Tall el-Hammam. Scientific Reports 15, 13869. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98362-9
@article{boslough2025misunderstandings,
author = {Boslough, Mark and Bruno, Andy},
title = {Misunderstandings about the Tunguska event, shock wave physics, and airbursts have resulted in misinterpretations of evidence at Tall el-Hammam},
journal = {Scientific Reports 15, 13869},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-025-98362-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98362-9}
}TY - JOUR TI - Misunderstandings about the Tunguska event, shock wave physics, and airbursts have resulted in misinterpretations of evidence at Tall el-Hammam AU - Boslough, Mark AU - Bruno, Andy PY - 2025 JO - Scientific Reports 15, 13869 DO - 10.1038/s41598-025-98362-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98362-9 ER -
Boslough, Mark and Andy Bruno. “Misunderstandings about the Tunguska event, shock wave physics, and airbursts have resulted in misinterpretations of evidence at Tall el-Hammam.” Scientific Reports 15, 13869 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98362-9.