0
Rejection of Holliday et al.'s alleged refutation of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
Martin B. Sweatman, James L. Powell, Allen West, 2024. Earth-Science Reviews 258, 104960.
The proponents' reply: argues that scores of papers have corroborated the key evidence, that Holliday et al. offer no new evidence or alternative process, and that differences of interpretation do not amount to falsification.
What it's used for here
The proponents' position as of 2024.
Cited by on this site 2 records
The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Sweatman, M. B., Powell, J. L., & West, A. (2024). Rejection of Holliday et al.'s alleged refutation of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. Earth-Science Reviews 258, 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104960
@article{sweatman2024rejection,
author = {Sweatman, Martin B. and Powell, James L. and West, Allen},
title = {Rejection of Holliday et al.'s alleged refutation of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis},
journal = {Earth-Science Reviews 258, 104960},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104960},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104960}
}TY - JOUR TI - Rejection of Holliday et al.'s alleged refutation of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis AU - Sweatman, Martin B. AU - Powell, James L. AU - West, Allen PY - 2024 JO - Earth-Science Reviews 258, 104960 DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104960 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104960 ER -
Sweatman, Martin B. et al.. “Rejection of Holliday et al.'s alleged refutation of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.” Earth-Science Reviews 258, 104960 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104960.