Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH)

Vance T. Holliday, Tyrone L. Daulton, Patrick J. Bartlein et al., 2023. Earth-Science Reviews 247, 104502.

A review of the whole evidence base by 13 authors from geology, geochemistry, impact physics, palaeobotany and archaeology. Concludes that no crater dates to the onset, that the proxies have problems of identification and are not unique to the boundary, that few high-proxy sites are well dated, and that there is no evidence of continental catastrophe, population decline or a single-moment extinction.

MYS0D51WZ1P63TH · mystery · click to copyMYounger Dryas impact hypothesisArticledoi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104502Checked against the original0

What it's used for here

The reference statement of the mainstream position.

Cited by on this site 6 records

Cite it

Holliday, V. T., Daulton, T. L., Bartlein, P. J., Boslough, M. B., Breslawski, R. P., Fisher, A. E., Jorgeson, I. A., Scott, A. C., Koeberl, C., Marlon, J. R., Severinghaus, J., Petaev, M. I., & Claeys, P. (2023). Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH). Earth-Science Reviews 247, 104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104502
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.