0
A blind test of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
Vance Holliday, Todd Surovell, Eileen Johnson, 2016. PLOS ONE 11(7), e0155470.
Two laboratories analysed identical splits of samples from Lubbock Lake, Texas, without knowing their depths. Magnetic microspherules and nanodiamonds were low or absent at, above and below the boundary except in one sample younger than 11,500 years, where they were two to four orders of magnitude higher.
What it's used for here
A blind split-sample test of reproducibility and uniqueness.
The document 13 pages
Cited by on this site 7 records
EVD
The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Holliday, V., Surovell, T., & Johnson, E. (2016). A blind test of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. PLOS ONE 11(7), e0155470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470
@article{holliday2016blind,
author = {Holliday, Vance and Surovell, Todd and Johnson, Eileen},
title = {A blind test of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis},
journal = {PLOS ONE 11(7), e0155470},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0155470},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470}
}TY - JOUR TI - A blind test of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis AU - Holliday, Vance AU - Surovell, Todd AU - Johnson, Eileen PY - 2016 JO - PLOS ONE 11(7), e0155470 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0155470 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470 ER -
Holliday, Vance et al.. “A blind test of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.” PLOS ONE 11(7), e0155470 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470.