0
The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a requiem
Nicholas Pinter, Andrew C. Scott, Tyrone L. Daulton et al., 2011. Earth-Science Reviews 106(3–4), 247–264.
A review arguing that each proposed impact marker had failed replication or had terrestrial explanations.
What it's used for here
The state of the critique four years after the hypothesis was proposed.
Our copy
Research copy, for editors and curators. The work is the publisher's, so readers are sent to it. We keep this copy so the citation can be checked if the page changes or goes.
doi.org · fetched 27 Oct 2026
Loading…
Cited by on this site 2 records
Cite it
Pinter, N., Scott, A. C., Daulton, T. L., Podoll, A., Koeberl, C., Anderson, R. S., & Ishman, S. E. (2011). The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a requiem. Earth-Science Reviews 106(3–4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005
@article{pinter2011requiem,
author = {Pinter, Nicholas and Scott, Andrew C. and Daulton, Tyrone L. and Podoll, Andrew and Koeberl, Christian and Anderson, R. Scott and Ishman, Scott E.},
title = {The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a requiem},
journal = {Earth-Science Reviews 106(3–4), 247–264},
year = {2011},
doi = {10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005}
}TY - JOUR TI - The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a requiem AU - Pinter, Nicholas AU - Scott, Andrew C. AU - Daulton, Tyrone L. AU - Podoll, Andrew AU - Koeberl, Christian AU - Anderson, R. Scott AU - Ishman, Scott E. PY - 2011 JO - Earth-Science Reviews 106(3–4), 247–264 DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005 ER -
Pinter, Nicholas et al.. “The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a requiem.” Earth-Science Reviews 106(3–4), 247–264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005.