0
To investigate or not to investigate? Researchers' views on unexplored atmospheric light phenomena
Etienne Caron, Pouya Faridi, 2016. Frontiers in Earth Science 4, 17.
A perspective on why the lights are under-studied: rates of 15–20 a week in 1981–1984 and 10–20 a year now, proposed models (scandium-bearing dust combustion, dusty plasma), the association with UFOs as a deterrent, and researchers' views on funding and instruments.
What it's used for here
The best open overview of the phenomenon's characteristics and the state of research.
The document 5 pages
Cited by on this site 3 records
The Hessdalen lights
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Caron, E., & Faridi, P. (2016). To investigate or not to investigate? Researchers' views on unexplored atmospheric light phenomena. Frontiers in Earth Science 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00017
@article{caron2016investigate,
author = {Caron, Etienne and Faridi, Pouya},
title = {To investigate or not to investigate? Researchers' views on unexplored atmospheric light phenomena},
journal = {Frontiers in Earth Science 4, 17},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.3389/feart.2016.00017},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00017}
}TY - JOUR TI - To investigate or not to investigate? Researchers' views on unexplored atmospheric light phenomena AU - Caron, Etienne AU - Faridi, Pouya PY - 2016 JO - Frontiers in Earth Science 4, 17 DO - 10.3389/feart.2016.00017 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00017 ER -
Caron, Etienne and Pouya Faridi. “To investigate or not to investigate? Researchers' views on unexplored atmospheric light phenomena.” Frontiers in Earth Science 4, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00017.