0
Animal Mutilations: What We Know
George E. Onet, 2000. National Institute for Discovery Science.
NIDS's veterinary pathologist summarises the mutilation literature: the soft tissues usually missing, the FBI-era finding of predators, and the minority reports (a Colorado pathologist's and a 1991 Oregon State laboratory's) of lesions consistent with heat or electrosurgery, which he notes could also be desiccation.
What it's used for here
The strongest published statement of the "something other than scavengers" reading, from the investigators' own side.
Our copy
Research copy, for editors and curators. The work is the publisher's, so readers are sent to it. We keep this copy so the citation can be checked if the page changes or goes.
web.archive.org · fetched 29 Oct 2026
Loading…
Cited by on this site 5 records
Skinwalker Ranch
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Onet, G. E. (2000). Animal Mutilations: What We Know. National Institute for Discovery Science. https://web.archive.org/web/20001018011004/http://www.nidsci.org/articles/animal1.html
@misc{onet2000animal,
author = {Onet, George E.},
title = {Animal Mutilations: What We Know},
howpublished = {National Institute for Discovery Science},
year = {2000},
url = {https://web.archive.org/web/20001018011004/http://www.nidsci.org/articles/animal1.html}
}TY - ELEC TI - Animal Mutilations: What We Know AU - Onet, George E. PY - 2000 JO - National Institute for Discovery Science UR - https://web.archive.org/web/20001018011004/http://www.nidsci.org/articles/animal1.html ER -
Onet, George E.. “Animal Mutilations: What We Know.” National Institute for Discovery Science (2000).