Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

The Nikumaroro bones identification controversy: First-hand examination versus evaluation by proxy. Amelia Earhart found or still missing?

Pamela J. Cross, Richard Wright, 2015. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports.

A review of the 1941 and 1998 analyses concluding that Hoodless's first-hand examination is the more robust and that the bones belonged to a robust middle-aged man. JAS: Reports 3, 52–59.

MYS0CYPMFQR4AWT · mystery · click to copyMDisappearance of Amelia EarhartArticledoi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.05.015Checked against the original0

What it's used for here

The peer-reviewed case against the female identification.

Cited by on this site 5 records

Cite it

Cross, P. J., & Wright, R. (2015). The Nikumaroro bones identification controversy: First-hand examination versus evaluation by proxy. Amelia Earhart found or still missing?. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.05.015
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.