Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Entropy, the Indus Script, and Language: A Reply to R. Sproat

Rajesh P. N. Rao, Nisha Yadav, Mayank N. Vahia et al., 2010. Computational Linguistics.

Replies that the Science paper never claimed entropy alone proves language, that block entropy results were omitted from Sproat's account, and that his comparison systems are poorly documented. Computational Linguistics 36(4).

MYS0CWY3A6018QP · mystery · click to copyMIndus scriptArticledoi: 10.1162/coli_c_00030Checked against the original0

What it's used for here

The reply in the exchange.

Cited by on this site 2 records

Cite it

Rao, R. P. N., Yadav, N., Vahia, M. N., Joglekar, H., Adhikari, R., & Mahadevan, I. (2010). Entropy, the Indus Script, and Language: A Reply to R. Sproat. Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_c_00030
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.