0
The Kensington Rune-Stone is Genuine: Linguistic, Practical, Methodological Considerations
Robert A., Jr. Hall, 1982.
A Cornell linguist's case that the inscription's language is consistent with fourteenth-century Scandinavian and that the stone is genuine.
What it's used for here
The main case for authenticity from a professional linguist.
Cited by on this site 1 record
The Kensington Runestone
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Hall, R. A. J. (1982). The Kensington Rune-Stone is Genuine: Linguistic, Practical, Methodological Considerations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Hall_Jr.
@book{hall1982kensington,
author = {Hall, Robert A., Jr.},
title = {The Kensington Rune-Stone is Genuine: Linguistic, Practical, Methodological Considerations},
year = {1982},
url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Hall_Jr.}
}TY - BOOK TI - The Kensington Rune-Stone is Genuine: Linguistic, Practical, Methodological Considerations AU - Hall, Robert A., Jr. PY - 1982 UR - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Hall_Jr. ER -
Hall, Robert A., Jr.. “The Kensington Rune-Stone is Genuine: Linguistic, Practical, Methodological Considerations.” 1982.