0
The Kensington Runestone: Fact and Fiction
Henrik Williams, 2012. Swedish-American Historical Quarterly 63(1), 3-22.
An Uppsala runologist's review of what is established and what is not about the stone, its runes and language.
What it's used for here
A modern runological assessment.
Our copy
Research copy, for editors and curators. The work is the publisher's, so readers are sent to it. We keep this copy so the citation can be checked if the page changes or goes.
doi.org · fetched 27 Oct 2026
Loading…
Cited by on this site 2 records
The Kensington Runestone
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Williams, H. (2012). The Kensington Runestone: Fact and Fiction. Swedish-American Historical Quarterly 63(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1353/swe.2012.a939408
@article{williams2012kensington,
author = {Williams, Henrik},
title = {The Kensington Runestone: Fact and Fiction},
journal = {Swedish-American Historical Quarterly 63(1), 3-22},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.1353/swe.2012.a939408},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1353/swe.2012.a939408}
}TY - JOUR TI - The Kensington Runestone: Fact and Fiction AU - Williams, Henrik PY - 2012 JO - Swedish-American Historical Quarterly 63(1), 3-22 DO - 10.1353/swe.2012.a939408 UR - https://doi.org/10.1353/swe.2012.a939408 ER -
Williams, Henrik. “The Kensington Runestone: Fact and Fiction.” Swedish-American Historical Quarterly 63(1), 3-22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1353/swe.2012.a939408.