0
On Sourcing Stonehenge Sarsen Stone #58: A Response to Nash and Ciborowski's Comments
R. G. V. Hancock, M. P. Gorton, W. C. Mahaney et al., 2025. Archaeometry.
A short response holding that no definitive geochemical match for Stone 58 can be argued from the available data. No new analyses.
What it's used for here
Cited to show the exchange is unresolved in print.
Cited by on this site 2 records
Stonehenge
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Hancock, R. G. V., Gorton, M. P., Mahaney, W. C., Aufreiter, S., & Michelaki, K. (2025). On Sourcing Stonehenge Sarsen Stone #58: A Response to Nash and Ciborowski's Comments. Archaeometry. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70028
@article{hancock2025response,
author = {Hancock, R. G. V. and Gorton, M. P. and Mahaney, W. C. and Aufreiter, S. and Michelaki, K.},
title = {On Sourcing Stonehenge Sarsen Stone \#58: A Response to Nash and Ciborowski's Comments},
journal = {Archaeometry},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1111/arcm.70028},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70028}
}TY - JOUR TI - On Sourcing Stonehenge Sarsen Stone #58: A Response to Nash and Ciborowski's Comments AU - Hancock, R. G. V. AU - Gorton, M. P. AU - Mahaney, W. C. AU - Aufreiter, S. AU - Michelaki, K. PY - 2025 JO - Archaeometry DO - 10.1111/arcm.70028 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70028 ER -
Hancock, R. G. V. et al.. “On Sourcing Stonehenge Sarsen Stone #58: A Response to Nash and Ciborowski's Comments.” Archaeometry (2025). https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70028.