0
Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58
Ronald G. V. Hancock, Michael P. Gorton, William C. Mahaney et al., 2024. Archaeometry.
A reanalysis of the 2020 geochemical data for Stone 58 that weighs the elements by their geochemistry rather than as numbers to sort. Questions the single-source reading and argues that three to six sources cannot be ruled out.
What it's used for here
The published challenge to the West Woods source.
Cited by on this site 4 records
Stonehenge
MYSThe mystery article
Where did the sarsens come from?
QSTQuestion
Cite it
Hancock, R. G. V., Gorton, M. P., Mahaney, W. C., Aufreiter, S., & Michelaki, K. (2024). Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58. Archaeometry. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999
@article{hancock2024stonehenge,
author = {Hancock, Ronald G. V. and Gorton, Michael P. and Mahaney, William C. and Aufreiter, Suzanne and Michelaki, Kostalena},
title = {Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone \#58},
journal = {Archaeometry},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1111/arcm.12999},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999}
}TY - JOUR TI - Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58 AU - Hancock, Ronald G. V. AU - Gorton, Michael P. AU - Mahaney, William C. AU - Aufreiter, Suzanne AU - Michelaki, Kostalena PY - 2024 JO - Archaeometry DO - 10.1111/arcm.12999 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999 ER -
Hancock, Ronald G. V. et al.. “Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58.” Archaeometry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999.