Mysteries Department Sign in
MYS08HTEHX052AX · mystery · click to copyMVoynich Manuscript/Research sessions/SES08H7J9Z07B3D
SES08H7J9Z07B3D · session · click to copy

Session 3: Reading the published research

2026-03 · ledger S-001 · draft · Kyle Prier, Claude (Anthropic)

The draft met the literature: Davis's five scribes (2020) replaced "two or three hands"; Greshko's Naibbe cipher (2025) was weighed against the readings; Bowern and Lindemann's morphological measures moved the "Arabic grammar" idea to a structural analogy; Leiden conventions were adopted for transcribed readings; a 16-chapter book was planned.

What it claimed, and what became of it

3
ClaimThenNow
ST-02 Morphological complexity like Germanic languages (Bowern and Lindemann)
Our own entropies match theirs (session 5); what the measure implies about language family is not settled.
 M Restated
CL-01 Lullian, scholastic-encyclopaedic tradition
Re-registered in session 9 as the constructed-language hypothesis; first glyphs carry three times Latin's topic information.
 M Open
CL-03 Cartographic tradition of al-Idrisi
Rested on the six-zone rosette.
 M Refuted

Decisions

  • Do the Picatrix research before writing (Kyle).
  • Add a chapter reviewing the historiography to Part I (Kyle).
  • Frame the Arabic-grammar claim as structural analogy, while noting the possibility (Kyle).
  • Title: Toward a Reading of the Voynich Manuscript: Lexical Anchors, Morphological Architecture, and the Constructed Language of a Fifteenth-Century Cosmo-Medical System.

Sources consulted

4
How many glyphs and how many scribes? Digital paleography and the Voynich manuscript SRC08JHRPVG4Z28
The linguistics of the Voynich manuscript SRC08JHTHEG6MSY
Character entropy in modern and historical texts: comparison metrics for an undeciphered manuscript SRC08JHV0383RBG
The Naibbe cipher: a substitution cipher that encrypts Latin and Italian as Voynich manuscript-like ciphertext SRC08JHZJJR0Z8T

The session's log

Date: 2026-03 (prior to compacted transcript)
Researchers: Kyle Prier, Claude (Anthropic)

Research conducted:

  • Davis (2020) five-scribe analysis integrated
  • Greshko (2025) Naibbe cipher paper assessed
  • Bowern & Lindemann MATTR analysis integrated
  • Leiden Conventions identified for translation notation
  • Seven-planet testing protocol established

Key outcomes:

  • Scribal hand count revised: 5 scribes (Davis 2020), not 2–3
  • Currier A/B scribal distribution confirmed: Scribes 1 & 4 write A; Scribes 2, 3, 5 write B
  • Arabic-grammar hypothesis revised to "structural analogy, not etymology" (Bowern/Lindemann MATTR → Germanic/Romance morphological profile)
  • Greshko (2025) cipher hypothesis engaged: Structural Lexical Anchoring shown to survive even under cipher hypothesis (pictorial labels bypass encryption)
  • Translation notation: Leiden Conventions adopted (⟦ ⟧ certain, [ ] inferred, { } contextual, ⟨ ⟩ speculative, · · · undecoded)
  • Book structure proposed (16 chapters + 4 appendices)

User decisions:

  1. Conduct Picatrix research before writing
  2. Add historiographic research review chapter to Part I
  3. Arabic-grammar claim: use more defensible "structural analogy" framing while noting the possibility
  4. Title confirmed: Toward a Reading of the Voynich Manuscript: Lexical Anchors, Morphological Architecture, and the Constructed Language of a Fifteenth-Century Cosmo-Medical System