Voynich ManuscriptEvidence
Evidence · Voynich Manuscript
A Naibbe key search that recovers planted keys finds no reading of the manuscript
A Naibbe-structured key search that recovers planted keys at 98-99 % finds no key that reads the manuscript as Latin or Italian: its held-out text scores no better than the manuscript's own words shuffled.
What it means
Most likelyunchanged
Most likelyunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onLatin or Italian under the Naibbe cipher
Counts against2 for, 3 against
Still possibleunchanged
Next steps 5
1
T39, second round of the section-level grid: add the two mechanisms that produce what T38 cannot reach. (a) Re-spacing: write the cipher as a continuous glyph stream and place spaces by a rule (after word-final glyphs such as -y, -n, -r, -l, before q-, ch-, d-), so word edges depend on neighbouring glyphs (T15's re-spaced stream gave edge MI 0.22). (b) Local copying: with probability p the next word is a one-glyph variant of a word among the last w (self-citation), for the near-twins. Cross with the T38 table-stay knob and the line layer, confirm best settings on fresh seeds.
~8 h
—not judged
2
Naibbe-type key over glyph strings learned from the manuscript rather than Greshko's inventory (which reads 78 % of tokens), with whole-word signs for common words, validated on planted keys first. It would also have to keep page locality, which letter-level homophones erase (M-T36).
~16 h
—not judged
3
Codebook attack: group one-glyph variant families that share contexts, then align the manuscript's co-occurrence structure with Latin texts of the same genres (unsupervised lexicon induction: embedding alignment, graph matching). Validate on a planted Latin codebook with variants laid into the same pages first.
~20 h
—not judged
4
Section-level key search: run the M-T37 solver within single sections (training and held-out pages alternating by bifolio), so a key need not hold across sections whose order and scribes differ.
~6 h
—not judged
Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takesAll 5 on the question
Sources 2
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). A Naibbe key search that recovers planted keys finds no reading of the manuscript [Evidence EVD0DC7R8DGCH2E]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DC7R8DGCH2E
@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0dc7r8dgch2e,
title = {A Naibbe key search that recovers planted keys finds no reading of the manuscript},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0DC7R8DGCH2E},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DC7R8DGCH2E}
}