Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Voynich Manuscript

A Naibbe key search that recovers planted keys finds no reading of the manuscript

A Naibbe-structured key search that recovers planted keys at 98-99 % finds no key that reads the manuscript as Latin or Italian: its held-out text scores no better than the manuscript's own words shuffled.

Supported0

What it means

Key questionWhat kind of text is it?
Most likely: a notation or memory system
Most likelyunchanged
Part of itIs it a cipher of a known language?
Partly answered
Most likelyunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onLatin or Italian under the Naibbe cipher
Counts against2 for, 3 against
Still possibleunchanged

Next steps 5

1
T39, second round of the section-level grid: add the two mechanisms that produce what T38 cannot reach. (a) Re-spacing: write the cipher as a continuous glyph stream and place spaces by a rule (after word-final glyphs such as -y, -n, -r, -l, before q-, ch-, d-), so word edges depend on neighbouring glyphs (T15's re-spaced stream gave edge MI 0.22). (b) Local copying: with probability p the next word is a one-glyph variant of a word among the last w (self-citation), for the near-twins. Cross with the T38 table-stay knob and the line layer, confirm best settings on fresh seeds.
~8 h
—not judged
2
Naibbe-type key over glyph strings learned from the manuscript rather than Greshko's inventory (which reads 78 % of tokens), with whole-word signs for common words, validated on planted keys first. It would also have to keep page locality, which letter-level homophones erase (M-T36).
~16 h
—not judged
3
Codebook attack: group one-glyph variant families that share contexts, then align the manuscript's co-occurrence structure with Latin texts of the same genres (unsupervised lexicon induction: embedding alignment, graph matching). Validate on a planted Latin codebook with variants laid into the same pages first.
~20 h
—not judged
4
Section-level key search: run the M-T37 solver within single sections (training and held-out pages alternating by bifolio), so a key need not hold across sections whose order and scribes differ.
~6 h
—not judged
Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takesAll 5 on the question

Sources 2

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). A Naibbe key search that recovers planted keys finds no reading of the manuscript [Evidence EVD0DC7R8DGCH2E]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DC7R8DGCH2E
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.