Vinča signsEvidence
Evidence · Vinča signs
Mäder's 2019 analysis of the sign sequences classed 59 per cent as pottery marks and 11.5 per cent as whorl ornament…
Mäder's 2019 analysis of the sign sequences classed 59 per cent as pottery marks and 11.5 per cent as whorl ornament, and concluded the Danube script is neither writing nor proto-writing.
What it means
Key questionDo the Vinča signs record language, a conventional notation, or neither?
6 answers, none ahead yet
Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onThe signs are a writing system (the Danube script)
Counts against1 for, 2 against
Still possibleunchanged
Sources 1
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). Mäder's 2019 analysis of the sign sequences classed 59 per cent as pottery marks and 11.5 per cent as whorl ornament… [Evidence EVD0DEE9AY8JDBR]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEE9AY8JDBR
@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0dee9ay8jdbr,
title = {Mäder's 2019 analysis of the sign sequences classed 59 per cent as pottery marks and 11.5 per cent as whorl ornament…},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0DEE9AY8JDBR},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEE9AY8JDBR}
}