The Ruina panel judged the hydroacoustic evidence not persuasive.

Speculative0

What it bears on 1 answer

The signal had another source, natural or man-made, and its timing is coincidental.

Still possible

FOR

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). The Ruina panel judged the hydroacoustic evidence not persuasive. [Evidence EVD0CW4X4TC0435]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0CW4X4TC0435

@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0cw4x4tc0435,
  title     = {The Ruina panel judged the hydroacoustic evidence not persuasive.},
  author    = {{Mysteries Department}},
  year      = {2026},
  note      = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0CW4X4TC0435},
  url       = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0CW4X4TC0435}
}