Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Do the independent plate archives (Sonneberg, Sternberg, Maria Mitchell) agree with Harvard about the star's brightness from 1934 to 1990?

Asked 30 Oct 2026 by ·Part of Did the star fade over the twentieth century?·0 answers·0·0 following
No evidence yetNothing has been tested yet. Propose an answer, or add evidence.

Where it stands

No answers have been proposed yet.

Why it matters

The century-fade dispute has been fought almost entirely on Harvard's plates, where all post-1962 data come from one series. Three independent archives exist and already disagree: Sonneberg and Sternberg find the star constant to 0.03-0.04 mag per century, Maria Mitchell finds +0.12 ± 0.02. None has been reduced with a pre-registered matched-comparison method, and none has been tested specifically for a 0.1 mag step between the 1950s and the 1970s. Agreement among archives, not more Harvard statistics, is what would settle the parent question.

Answers 0

No answers yet
Propose one the evidence could support or rule out.

What would settle it

  1. Digitise the published 5-year bins from Hippke et al. 2017 (Sonneberg pg and pv, Sternberg) and Castelaz and Barker 2018 (Maria Mitchell) and test each archive for a step of 0.07-0.10 mag between 1930-1953 and 1969-1990 with the same statistic used on DR7; report whether the archives agree with each other and with Harvard.

History

  1. Session 1: raised the question
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion