Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

How reliable are the Sherman family's 1994–96 accounts, and how did they reach print?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·4 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: the core of the accounts was reported in good faith, but the story grew as researchers, the press and the…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Four answers have been proposed. The core of the accounts was reported in good faith, but the story grew as researchers, the press and the… leads, with evidence 2 for, 1 against: partly supported by its tests. Three are still possible. Of the one narrower question under it, one is answered.

Why it matters

Every later claim about the ranch starts with Terry and Gwen Sherman, who went public in a single newspaper feature in June 1996⁠[1]. Within three months they had sold to Bigelow and Terry Sherman was working for him under a nondisclosure agreement, so after October 1996 their story reached print through others: researchers quoted in the press, and then the 2005 book, which renames them the Gormans⁠[2]⁠[3]. How much of the founding account is first-hand, and how much it changed on the way, decides how much weight it can bear.

Answers 4

None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
Evidence: 2 for, 1 against
Still possible
The accounts were largely made up before the sale.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Still possible

History

  1. Van Eyck puts forward: the Shermans honestly reported experiences they could not explain, and the June 1996 article is a fair record…
  2. Van Eyck: the Shermans had not reported the cattle deaths or sightings to officials, and the county sheriff had no…Against: The Shermans honestly reported experiences they could not explain, and the June 1996 article is a fair record…
  3. Van Eyck: the family gave the account under their own names to a newspaper before any buyer appeared, and said they…For: The Shermans honestly reported experiences they could not explain, and the June 1996 article is a fair record…
  4. Van Eyck: the wolf, the vanished dogs and the humanoid figure are absent from the June 1996 account and appear later,…For: The core of the accounts was reported in good faith, but the story grew as researchers, the press and the…
  5. Van Eyck: the family said they lost money on the sale.Against: The accounts were largely made up before the sale.
  6. McCue puts forward: the core of the accounts was reported in good faith, but the story grew as researchers, the press and the…
  7. McCue: salisbury, who interviewed the family, nonetheless accepted that genuinely anomalous events occurred while…Against: The core of the accounts was reported in good faith, but the story grew as researchers, the press and the…
  8. McCue: terry Sherman told Frank Salisbury that much in Hunt for the Skinwalker only resembled his experiences and…For: The core of the accounts was reported in good faith, but the story grew as researchers, the press and the…
  9. Sheaffer puts forward: the accounts were largely made up before the sale.
  10. Sheaffer: many of the most bizarre incidents in the 2005 book were witnessed only by Terry Sherman, who stayed on as…For: The accounts were largely made up before the sale.
  11. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion