Answer · San José galleon
Sea Search Armada is entitled to half the treasure under the 2007 Supreme Court ruling because its 1982 find…
Sea Search Armada is entitled to half the treasure under the 2007 Supreme Court ruling because its 1982 find is the same site.
Where it stands
DisputedTwo pieces of evidence for, one against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
What it predicts
- The 1982 coordinates, within survey error, coincide with the 2015 site.
- The tribunal finds jurisdiction under the TPA and a compensable investment.
What would rule it out
- The tribunal finds the sites differ, or the claims time-barred.
Evidence 2 for · 1 against
FOR
The questions it answers
Most likelyColombia owns the wreck as submerged cultural heritage in its waters under Law 1675 of 2013
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). Sea Search Armada is entitled to half the treasure under the 2007 Supreme Court ruling because its 1982 find… [Answer ANS0D4VYKQT3R2X]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D4VYKQT3R2X
@misc{mysteriesdept_ans0d4vykqt3r2x,
title = {Sea Search Armada is entitled to half the treasure under the 2007 Supreme Court ruling because its 1982 find…},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Answer, catalog key ANS0D4VYKQT3R2X},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D4VYKQT3R2X}
}