Are the notes a cipher, a private shorthand, or not a message at all?
Four answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.
Where it stands
Four answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Four are still possible.
Answers 4
History
- Federal Bureau of Investigation puts forward: the notes encrypt a message under a consistent cipher system.
- NBC News / KMBC puts forward: the notes are a private shorthand, with recurring groups standing for words, written by McCormick for his own…
- NBC News / KMBC: the FBI CRRU and the American Cryptogram Association could not identify the system.Against: The notes encrypt a message under a consistent cipher system.
- NBC News / KMBC: relatives told investigators McCormick had used such notes since boyhood.For: The notes are a private shorthand, with recurring groups standing for words, written by McCormick for his own…
- NBC News / KMBC: the FBI said in 2011 that he could read and write.Against: The marks imitate writing and carry no recoverable message.
- Tritto puts forward: the marks imitate writing and carry no recoverable message.
- Tritto: his mother said 'the only thing he could write was his name'; a cousin said he 'couldn't spell anything, just…For: The marks imitate writing and carry no recoverable message.
- Mysteries Department: most letter groups end in SE, which a simple substitution of English would not produce.Against: The notes encrypt a message under a consistent cipher system.
- Mysteries Department: groups such as NCBE (about 18 times) and WLD (about 13) recur; bracketed entries carry numbers.For: The notes are a private shorthand, with recurring groups standing for words, written by McCormick for his own…
- Asked on this site