Were the clay tokens and bullae the direct ancestors of the proto-cuneiform signs?
One answer, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.
Where it stands
One answer has been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. One is still possible.
Why it matters
Schmandt-Besserat argued that clay counters, sealed in clay envelopes and impressed on their surfaces, became the numerical signs, and that complex tokens became commodity signs[1]. The first step is widely accepted; the second rests on visual resemblance between tokens and signs, most token types are rare, and no agreed criterion separates a numerical token from a bead or a gaming piece[2][3].
Answers 1
History
- Denise Schmandt-Besserat: plain tokens sealed in bullae and impressed on their surfaces precede and resemble the numerical signs of the Uruk V…For: The token theory
- Paul Zimansky: the links between complex tokens and commodity signs rest on visual resemblance, most token subtypes are unique or…Against: The token theory
- Robert K. Englund: plain tokens sealed in bullae and impressed on their surfaces precede and resemble the numerical signs of the Uruk V…For: The token theory
- Session 1: raised the question, proposed one answer and found two results bearing on its answers