Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Answer · Proto-cuneiform: the archaic texts of Uruk

The language is unknown (Englund's agnosticism)

The language of the archaic scribes is unknown: the Sumerian attribution is a convention, and the first writers may have spoken a language that left no other record.

Still possibleAnswers 1 question0

Where it stands

Still possibleOne piece of evidence for, one against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

What it predicts

  • No secure phonetic spelling of a Sumerian word will be found in Uruk IV.
  • The archaic name corpus will differ significantly from Early Dynastic Sumerian names in structure.
  • The first phonetic spellings, when they appear at Ur about 2900 BC, will coincide with the first Sumerian-pattern names.

What would rule it out

  • A secure Sumerian rebus spelling in an Uruk IV text.
  • A tabulated test showing the archaic names share Sumerian structure at a rate well above chance.

Evidence 1 for · 1 against

The questions it answers

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). The language is unknown (Englund's agnosticism) [Answer ANS0DEDW4E48QNF]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0DEDW4E48QNF
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.