Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Did any of the deaths share a common cause, such as killings by an intelligence service?

Asked 3 Nov 2026 by ·3 answers·0·0 following
Three answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.

Where it stands

Three answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Three are still possible.

Why it matters

This is the claim the story rests on: that the deaths were murders by the Soviet bloc, by Western services, or covered up by them. It is decided by whether any death can be shown to be a killing and, if so, by whom.

Answers 3

Evidence: 1 against
Still possible
Unconnected: each death had its own cause
Evidence for it, no test yet
Evidence: 2 for
Still possible
Evidence: none yet
Still possible

Next steps 2

1
Read FCO 65/3861 and FCO 7/8389 at Kew
Adds evidenceFair odds~6 h
11score
Details

The open Foreign Office files on Wash (1986) and Moyle (1991) are the only official files on any of these deaths known to be readable. They would show what the government knew and said privately.

2
Request the Avon and Somerset police reports on Dajibhai and Sharif
Adds evidencePoor odds
4score
Details

Freedom of Information request to Avon and Somerset Police and to the Avon coroner for the 1986-87 reports and inquest files. If released, they would show what evidence of third parties, if any, was found.

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes

History

  1. House of Commons: police and the Home Office found nothing linking the casesFor: Unconnected: each death had its own cause
  2. House of Commons: police and the Home Office found nothing linking the casesFor: Unconnected: each death had its own cause
  3. House of Commons: police and the Home Office found nothing linking the casesFor: Unconnected: each death had its own cause
  4. House of Commons: police and the Home Office found nothing linking the casesFor: Unconnected: each death had its own cause
  5. Crown Prosecution Service: the one solved case was a murder by an unconnected local offenderFor: Unconnected: each death had its own cause
  6. Slough Observer: the one solved case was a murder by an unconnected local offenderFor: Unconnected: each death had its own cause
  7. Crown Prosecution Service: the strongest foul-play case turned out to be an ordinary crimeAgainst: Soviet-bloc assassinations
  8. Slough Observer: the strongest foul-play case turned out to be an ordinary crimeAgainst: Soviet-bloc assassinations
  9. Session 1: raised the question and found three results bearing on its answers
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion