Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Is K4 solved, known but withheld, or open?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·4 answers·0·0 following
Answered: K4 is solved; its plaintext has been recovered and confirmed by its author.Passed its tests and review.

Where it stands

Four answers have been proposed. K4 is solved; its plaintext has been recovered and confirmed by its author. leads, with evidence 1 for, 2 against: partly supported by its tests. Three are still possible. Of the one narrower question under it, none is answered yet.

Why it matters

Since September 2025 the plaintext of K4 has been in the hands of people other than Sanborn, and since November 2025 his method has belonged to a buyer. Which of the three descriptions is right decides what the site should say and what work is still worth doing⁠[1]⁠[2]⁠[3].

Answers 4

Evidence: 1 for, 2 against
Most likely
None of these.
Failed a test; not refuted outright
Evidence: none yet
Disputed

History

  1. Bean: no peer-reviewed or verified decryption of K4 exists; published work is diagnostic.For: K4 remains unsolved as a cryptographic problem; no one has derived its plaintext and method from the…
  2. Schwartz puts forward: k4 is solved; its plaintext has been recovered and confirmed by its author.
  3. RR Auction puts forward: k4 remains unsolved as a cryptographic problem; no one has derived its plaintext and method from the…
  4. Agence France-Presse: sanborn says the find gave the plaintext but not the coding method or the key, which he calls a very…Against: K4 is solved; its plaintext has been recovered and confirmed by its author.
  5. Escoria & Maren: kobek himself says the find is not a cryptographic solve.Against: K4 is solved; its plaintext has been recovered and confirmed by its author.
  6. Schwartz: kobek and Byrne assembled a plaintext from archive scraps that matched the released clues in length and…For: K4 is solved; its plaintext has been recovered and confirmed by its author.
  7. RR Auction: the archive sold on 20 November 2025 included Sanborn's handwritten K4 plaintext and the original K4 coding…For: K4's plaintext and method are known to a few holders and deliberately unpublished.
  8. Agence France-Presse: kobek and Byrne refused NDAs but say they will not publish, after letters from the auction house's lawyers.For: K4's plaintext and method are known to a few holders and deliberately unpublished.
  9. Basilio: the Smithsonian sealed the relevant files for fifty years at Sanborn's request.For: K4's plaintext and method are known to a few holders and deliberately unpublished.
  10. Vergano: sanborn's position after the find is that K4 has not been solved and that it points toward K5.For: K4 remains unsolved as a cryptographic problem; no one has derived its plaintext and method from the…
  11. Robinson & Huang puts forward: k4's plaintext and method are known to a few holders and deliberately unpublished.
  12. Robinson & Huang: paradigm says Sanborn entered the plaintext into a verifier and that the firm has not seen it; it has not…For: K4's plaintext and method are known to a few holders and deliberately unpublished.
  13. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion