Evidence · Hattic, Kassite and the half-read languages of the cuneiform archives
Most scholars rejected Henning's comparison because it links names of about 2100 BC with a language first written in…
Most scholars rejected Henning's comparison because it links names of about 2100 BC with a language first written in the sixth century AD.
What it means
Key questionCan anything of Gutian and Lullubian be recovered from names alone?
3 answers, none ahead yet
Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onThe Gutian king names show Tocharian case endings, so Gutian was an early Indo-European language related to Tocharian.
Counts against1 for, 1 against
Still possibleunchanged
Sources 2
Gutians
SRCMieroop 2002
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). Most scholars rejected Henning's comparison because it links names of about 2100 BC with a language first written in… [Evidence EVD0DEEBBP6JE62]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEEBBP6JE62
@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0deebbp6je62,
title = {Most scholars rejected Henning's comparison because it links names of about 2100 BC with a language first written in…},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0DEEBBP6JE62},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEEBBP6JE62}
}