Do Eteocretan and Eteocypriot continue the Bronze Age languages written in Linear A and Cypro-Minoan?
Two answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.
Where it stands
Two answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Two are still possible.
Why it matters
Eteocretan is spoken of as the descendant of the Minoan language of Linear A, and Eteocypriot as the descendant of a language written in Cypro-Minoan, but in both cases about a thousand years separate the corpora and neither Bronze Age script has secure values beyond those borrowed from its relatives[1][2][3]. Janko's reading of the Enkomi cylinder as an Eteocypriot account is the most specific continuity proposal[4].
Answers 2
History
- Yves Duhoux: both Iron Age groups come from places of long pre-Greek settlement and are written in or beside scripts descended from…For: Both continue their Bronze Age local languages
- Yves Duhoux: about a thousand years separate each Iron Age corpus from its Bronze Age predecessor, and neither Linear A nor…For: Continuity is plausible but untestable on present evidence
- Yves Duhoux: both Iron Age groups come from places of long pre-Greek settlement and are written in or beside scripts descended from…For: Both continue their Bronze Age local languages
- Valério: about a thousand years separate each Iron Age corpus from its Bronze Age predecessor, and neither Linear A nor…For: Continuity is plausible but untestable on present evidence
- Philippa M. Steele: both Iron Age groups come from places of long pre-Greek settlement and are written in or beside scripts descended from…For: Both continue their Bronze Age local languages
- Salgarella: about a thousand years separate each Iron Age corpus from its Bronze Age predecessor, and neither Linear A nor…For: Continuity is plausible but untestable on present evidence
- Session 1: raised the question, proposed two answers and found two results bearing on its answers