Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Eteocretan and Eteocypriot

No identification outside the Anatolian, Semitic, Tyrrhenian and isolate positions has been argued in print for…

No identification outside the Anatolian, Semitic, Tyrrhenian and isolate positions has been argued in print for Eteocretan.

Speculative0

What it means

Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onNone of these.
Bears onnone for, none against
Still possiblewas No evidence yet

Next steps 3

1
From the site's transliteration CSV (DAT0DEDYM8KKQV6), build letter and bigram frequency tables for the Eteocretan lines and compare them with Greek, Lycian, Etruscan and Phoenician samples of equal length, with a shuffled-text null, to measure whether 420 letters can discriminate between candidate languages at all.
~6 h
—not judged
2
Measure whether 420 letters can discriminate between candidate languages using frequency tables and a shuffled null.
~6 h
—not judged
3
List every recurring Eteocretan sequence of three or more letters (inai, irer, -mit-, komn, phraiso-) with line positions across all six stones, and check each published Anatolian, Semitic and Tyrrhenian proposal against the full list rather than the words it chose.
~4 h
—not judged
Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes

Sources 2

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). No identification outside the Anatolian, Semitic, Tyrrhenian and isolate positions has been argued in print for… [Evidence EVD0DEED4S6J43E]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEED4S6J43E
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.