Answer · Ball lightning
It was a related but different phenomenon, such as a long-lived luminous ground-strike remnant, not…
It was a related but different phenomenon, such as a long-lived luminous ground-strike remnant, not representative of ball lightning in general.
Where it stands
Still possibleIts tests haven't settled it: two pieces of evidence for, none against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
What it predicts
- Properties (size, distance, duration) differ from typical reports.
What would rule it out
- Further recordings showing the same spectrum in typical reports.
Evidence 2 for · none against
FOR
The questions it answers
Most likelyYes; it was a ball of vaporised soil elements sustained after the stroke
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). It was a related but different phenomenon, such as a long-lived luminous ground-strike remnant, not… [Answer ANS0D40AD9Y1EQW]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D40AD9Y1EQW
@misc{mysteriesdept_ans0d40ad9y1eqw,
title = {It was a related but different phenomenon, such as a long-lived luminous ground-strike remnant, not…},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Answer, catalog key ANS0D40AD9Y1EQW},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D40AD9Y1EQW}
}