Answer · Ball lightning
Yes; it was a ball of vaporised soil elements sustained after the stroke.
Yes; it was a ball of vaporised soil elements sustained after the stroke.
Where it stands
Most likelyIts tests supported it: three pieces of evidence for, none against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
What it predicts
- Soil lines persist through the ball's life, not only at formation.
- Temperatures are lower in the soil lines than in air lines, consistent with a burning cloud around a hotter core.
What would rule it out
- Re-analysis showing the light is the decaying stroke channel or ground arc.
Evidence 3 for · none against
FOR
FOR
FOR
The questions it answers
Most likelyYes; it was a ball of vaporised soil elements sustained after the stroke
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). Yes; it was a ball of vaporised soil elements sustained after the stroke. [Answer ANS0D40ACAP3GBV]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D40ACAP3GBV
@misc{mysteriesdept_ans0d40acap3gbv,
title = {Yes; it was a ball of vaporised soil elements sustained after the stroke.},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Answer, catalog key ANS0D40ACAP3GBV},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D40ACAP3GBV}
}