# Colin Renfrew 1975: Glozel and the two cultures

> Colin Renfrew, 1975. 2 records on Mysteries Department cite it. Antiquity 49(195): 219-222. Renfrew's editorial on the clash between the physical dates…

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0DEDHQ9YRJ7M/glozel-and-the-two-cultures  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Sources](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources)[Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel)Colin Renfrew 1975

**0**

# Glozel and the two cultures

Colin Renfrew, 1975.

**Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field** Articledoi: **[10.1017/S0003598X00103461](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00103461)** 0

## What it's used for here

Antiquity 49(195): 219-222. Renfrew's editorial on the clash between the physical dates and the archaeological case, arguing that Glozel fails on stylistic coherence and stratigraphy whatever the TL says, and that the two kinds of evidence must be reconciled rather than one discarded.

## Cited by on this site 2 records

[The state's trenches found no Iron Age layer, the inscribed tablets with laboratory dates are medieval or modern, and…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/evidence/EVD0DEDY7PFFADZ/the-states-trenches-found-no-iron-age-layer-the-inscribed)

Evidence

EVD

[Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel)

The mystery article

MYS

## Cite it

```
Colin Renfrew (1975). Glozel and the two cultures. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00103461
```

[Find it at doi.org](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00103461)

Key

**SRC** 0DEDHQ9YRJ7M

Kind

Journal article

Rights

The publisher's

Kept

31 Oct 2026, for editors

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Bibliographic records are CC0. Take this one as CSL-JSON, BibTeX or RIS.

[CSL-JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0DEDHQ9YRJ7M/glozel-and-the-two-cultures/csl.json)