# Acedo 2017: The flyby anomaly: a multivariate analysis approach

> L. Acedo, 2017. 11 records on Mysteries Department cite it. The most complete published table of flyby parameters and anomalies.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CWYE16J6YDA/the-flyby-anomaly-a-multivariate-analysis-approach  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Sources](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources)[Earth flyby anomaly](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly)Acedo 2017

**0**

# The flyby anomaly: a multivariate analysis approach

L. Acedo, 2017. _Astrophysics and Space Science 362(2), 42_.

Tabulates nine Earth flybys with inclination, perigee latitude and altitude, asymptotic velocity and anomaly, including the null results of Rosetta 2007 and 2009, MESSENGER and Juno 2013, and fits them with a model of an unknown latitude-dependent force of range about 300 km.

**Earth flyby anomaly** Articledoi: **[10.1007/s10509-017-3025-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3025-z)** Checked against the original0

## What it's used for here

The most complete published table of flyby parameters and anomalies.

## Cited by on this site 11 records

[Local parameters at perigee, as for a latitude-dependent force of about 300 km range.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/answers/ANS0CWYEEM83BZ2/local-parameters-at-perigee-as-for-a-latitude-dependent)

Answer

ANS

[Published parameters and anomalies of nine Earth flybys (1990–2013)](https://mysteriesdept.com/datasets/DAT0CWYEJ9E6J86/published-parameters-and-anomalies-of-nine-earth-flybys)

Dataset

DAT

[A multivariate fit of nine flybys predicts non-zero values only for Galileo II, NEAR and Cassini within…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/evidence/EVD0CWYEEW23KFY/a-multivariate-fit-of-nine-flybys-predicts-non-zero-values)

Evidence

EVD

[The formula failed for Rosetta 2007 and 2009 and for Juno 2013.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/evidence/EVD0CWYECNR6SG5/the-formula-failed-for-rosetta-2007-and-2009-and-for-juno)

Evidence

EVD

[The later Rosetta flybys and Juno, processed with newer software, show no anomaly.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/evidence/EVD0CWYEAFE66EG/the-later-rosetta-flybys-and-juno-processed-with-newer)

Evidence

EVD

[Galileo's second flyby at 303 km, with −4.6 mm/s after drag](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/events/EVT0CWYE7225RFV/galileos-second-flyby-at-303-km-with-4-6-mm-s-after-drag)

EVT

[Rosetta's second flyby shows no anomaly](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/events/EVT0CWYE8941STC/rosettas-second-flyby-shows-no-anomaly)

EVT

[Rosetta's third flyby shows no anomaly](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/events/EVT0CWYE8RR6MV3/rosettas-third-flyby-shows-no-anomaly)

EVT

[The Earth flyby anomaly](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly)

The mystery article

MYS

[What decides which flybys show an anomaly?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/questions/QST0CWYE9G65APR/what-decides-which-flybys-show-an-anomaly)

Question

QST

[What produces the velocity changes seen in some Earth flybys?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/flyby-anomaly/questions/QST0CWYE98C43P6/what-produces-the-velocity-changes-seen-in-some-earth-flybys)

Question

QST

## Cite it

```
Acedo, L. (2017). The flyby anomaly: a multivariate analysis approach. Astrophysics and Space Science 362(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3025-z
```

[Read it free at doi.org](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3025-z)

Key

**SRC** 0CWYE16J6YDA

Kind

Journal article

Rights

The publisher's

Kept

27 Oct 2026, for editors

Checked

Against the published article

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Bibliographic records are CC0. Take this one as CSL-JSON, BibTeX or RIS.

[CSL-JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CWYE16J6YDA/the-flyby-anomaly-a-multivariate-analysis-approach/csl.json)