# Nash 2025: Comment on: 'Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58'

> David J. Nash, T. Jake R. Ciborowski, 2025. 2 records on Mysteries Department cite it. The methodological rebuttal of the multi-source reanalysis.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CRWP5JR1DJC/comment-on-stonehenge-revisited-a-geochemical-approach-to  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Sources](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources)[Stonehenge](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge)Nash 2025

**0**

# Comment on: 'Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58'

David J. Nash, T. Jake R. Ciborowski, 2025. _Archaeometry_.

The West Woods authors' reply to Hancock et al.: absolute concentrations are unsuitable for silcrete with variable introduced silica, Si and Fe are too mobile to discriminate sources, and single samples miss the variability within an outcrop.

**Stonehenge** Articledoi: **[10.1111/arcm.13105](https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.13105)** Checked against the original0

## What it's used for here

The methodological rebuttal of the multi-source reanalysis.

## Cited by on this site 2 records

[The reanalysis's use of absolute concentrations and mobile elements is unsuited to silcrete.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge/evidence/EVD0CRWPYQE2Y6P/the-reanalysiss-use-of-absolute-concentrations-and-mobile)

Evidence

EVD

[Stonehenge](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge)

The mystery article

MYS

## Cite it

```
Nash, D. J., & Ciborowski, T. J. R. (2025). Comment on: 'Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58'. Archaeometry. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.13105
```

[Read it free at doi.org](https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.13105)

Key

**SRC** 0CRWP5JR1DJC

Kind

Journal article

Rights

CC-BY-4.0

Checked

Against the published article

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Bibliographic records are CC0. Take this one as CSL-JSON, BibTeX or RIS.

[CSL-JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CRWP5JR1DJC/comment-on-stonehenge-revisited-a-geochemical-approach-to/csl.json)