# Hancock 2024: Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58

> Ronald G. V. Hancock, Michael P. Gorton, William C. Mahaney et al., 2024. 4 records on Mysteries Department cite it. The published challenge to the West…

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CRWP5AY0J0G/stonehenge-revisited-a-geochemical-approach-to-interpreting  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Sources](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources)[Stonehenge](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge)Hancock 2024

**0**

# Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58

Ronald G. V. Hancock, Michael P. Gorton, William C. Mahaney et al., 2024. _Archaeometry_.

A reanalysis of the 2020 geochemical data for Stone 58 that weighs the elements by their geochemistry rather than as numbers to sort. Questions the single-source reading and argues that three to six sources cannot be ruled out.

**Stonehenge** Articledoi: **[10.1111/arcm.12999](https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999)** Checked against the original0

## What it's used for here

The published challenge to the West Woods source.

## Cited by on this site 4 records

[The megaliths came from several sources across Wessex, not one wood.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge/answers/ANS0CRWPZ7279K6/the-megaliths-came-from-several-sources-across-wessex-not)

Answer

ANS

[Read by their geochemistry, the Stone 58 data cannot exclude three to six sources.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge/evidence/EVD0CRWPYZ81JYC/read-by-their-geochemistry-the-stone-58-data-cannot-exclude)

Evidence

EVD

[Stonehenge](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge)

The mystery article

MYS

[Where did the sarsens come from?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/stonehenge/questions/QST0CRWPGAG7M10/where-did-the-sarsens-come-from)

Question

QST

## Cite it

```
Hancock, R. G. V., Gorton, M. P., Mahaney, W. C., Aufreiter, S., & Michelaki, K. (2024). Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58. Archaeometry. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999
```

[Read it free at doi.org](https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999)

Key

**SRC** 0CRWP5AY0J0G

Kind

Journal article

Rights

CC-BY-NC-4.0

Checked

Against the published article

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Bibliographic records are CC0. Take this one as CSL-JSON, BibTeX or RIS.

[CSL-JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CRWP5AY0J0G/stonehenge-revisited-a-geochemical-approach-to-interpreting/csl.json)