# Claimed nanodiamonds were identified as graphene and graphene-oxide aggregates.

> Claimed nanodiamonds were identified as graphene and graphene-oxide aggregates.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/evidence/EVD0D51XH3T39J1/claimed-nanodiamonds-were-identified-as-graphene-and  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact)Evidence

Evidence · Younger Dryas impact hypothesis

# Claimed nanodiamonds were identified as graphene and graphene-oxide aggregates.

Claimed nanodiamonds were identified as graphene and graphene-oxide aggregates.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[The markers are background cosmic dust, volcanic or anthropogenic spherules, fire products or misidentified…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/answers/ANS0D51XGM601YH/the-markers-are-background-cosmic-dust-volcanic-or)

Most likely

FOR

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). Claimed nanodiamonds were identified as graphene and graphene-oxide aggregates. [Evidence EVD0D51XH3T39J1]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0D51XH3T39J1
```

Key

**EVD** 0D51XH3T39J1

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0D51XH3T39J1)