# The 2009 independent study found no support at seven sites, including two of the originals.

> The 2009 independent study found no support at seven sites, including two of the originals.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/evidence/EVD0D51XGW059BP/the-2009-independent-study-found-no-support-at-seven-sites  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact)Evidence

Evidence · Younger Dryas impact hypothesis

# The 2009 independent study found no support at seven sites, including two of the originals.

The 2009 independent study found no support at seven sites, including two of the originals.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[The markers are background cosmic dust, volcanic or anthropogenic spherules, fire products or misidentified…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/answers/ANS0D51XGM601YH/the-markers-are-background-cosmic-dust-volcanic-or)

Most likely

FOR

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). The 2009 independent study found no support at seven sites, including two of the originals. [Evidence EVD0D51XGW059BP]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0D51XGW059BP
```

Key

**EVD** 0D51XGW059BP

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0D51XGW059BP)