# None of these.

> No evidence yet: None of these.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/answers/ANS0D51XSX20SPY/none-of-these  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Questions](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions)[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact)[Do the two 2025 PLOS One papers, retracted in February 2026, still add evidence for an impact?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/questions/QST0D51X9SE7KQA/do-the-two-2025-plos-one-papers-retracted-in-february-2026)Answer

Answer · Younger Dryas impact hypothesis

# None of these.

None of these.

**No evidence yet** Answers **1** question0

## Where it stands

**No evidence yet** Its tests haven't settled it: no evidence yet.

## The questions it answers

[Do the two 2025 PLOS One papers, retracted in February 2026, still add evidence for an impact?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/questions/QST0D51X9SE7KQA/do-the-two-2025-plos-one-papers-retracted-in-february-2026)

Part of [Is the claimed boundary layer the same age at every site?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/questions/QST0D51X8JC0DHZ/is-the-claimed-boundary-layer-the-same-age-at-every-site)

Most likelyThe results do not support the conclusions because the age models, sampling and some identifications fail

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). None of these. [Answer ANS0D51XSX20SPY]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D51XSX20SPY
```

Key

**ANS** 0D51XSX20SPY

Kind

Answer · none

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/ANS0D51XSX20SPY)