# The data and conclusions stand; the problems were procedural and could have been corrected.

> Disputed: The data and conclusions stand; the problems were procedural and could have been corrected.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/answers/ANS0D51XR6C3ZJZ/the-data-and-conclusions-stand-the-problems-were-procedural  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Questions](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions)[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact)[Do the two 2025 PLOS One papers, retracted in February 2026, still add evidence for an impact?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/questions/QST0D51X9SE7KQA/do-the-two-2025-plos-one-papers-retracted-in-february-2026)Answer

Answer · Younger Dryas impact hypothesis

# The data and conclusions stand; the problems were procedural and could have been corrected.

The data and conclusions stand; the problems were procedural and could have been corrected.

**Disputed** Answers **1** questionPublished0

## Where it stands

**Disputed** One piece of evidence for, none against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

## What it predicts

- Re-analysis of the deposited data with recommended calibration and complete sections keeps the peaks at the onset.

## What would rule it out

- Re-analysis moves the ages outside the Younger Dryas or shows the peaks are within background.

## Evidence 1 for · none against

[Lead author Christopher Moore said the group remains confident in the data, methods and conclusions.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/evidence/EVD0D51XRE62HW5/lead-author-christopher-moore-said-the-group-remains)

Speculative

FOR

## The questions it answers

[Do the two 2025 PLOS One papers, retracted in February 2026, still add evidence for an impact?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/questions/QST0D51X9SE7KQA/do-the-two-2025-plos-one-papers-retracted-in-february-2026)

Part of [Is the claimed boundary layer the same age at every site?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/younger-dryas-impact/questions/QST0D51X8JC0DHZ/is-the-claimed-boundary-layer-the-same-age-at-every-site)

Most likelyThe results do not support the conclusions because the age models, sampling and some identifications fail

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). The data and conclusions stand; the problems were procedural and could have been corrected. [Answer ANS0D51XR6C3ZJZ]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D51XR6C3ZJZ
```

Key

**ANS** 0D51XR6C3ZJZ

Kind

Answer · hypothesis

Origin

Published

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/ANS0D51XR6C3ZJZ)