# Los Alamos and Sandia analysts judged the signal consistent with a low-yield atmospheric burst.

> Los Alamos and Sandia analysts judged the signal consistent with a low-yield atmospheric burst.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/vela-incident/evidence/EVD0CW4WZY47GE3/los-alamos-and-sandia-analysts-judged-the-signal-consistent  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[1979 Vela incident](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/vela-incident)Evidence

Evidence · 1979 Vela incident

# Los Alamos and Sandia analysts judged the signal consistent with a low-yield atmospheric burst.

Los Alamos and Sandia analysts judged the signal consistent with a low-yield atmospheric burst.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[A low-yield atmospheric nuclear test of a few kilotons, near the ocean surface.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/vela-incident/answers/ANS0CW4WYYW57H0/a-low-yield-atmospheric-nuclear-test-of-a-few-kilotons-near)

Most likely

FOR

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). Los Alamos and Sandia analysts judged the signal consistent with a low-yield atmospheric burst. [Evidence EVD0CW4WZY47GE3]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0CW4WZY47GE3
```

Key

**EVD** 0CW4WZY47GE3

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0CW4WZY47GE3)