# The official historical review found no verifiable evidence of the programme

> AARO's 2024 historical review found no verifiable evidence that the US government recovered or reverse-engineered non-human technology, and traced…

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/missing-scientists/evidence/EVD0DCQS6T34KYW/the-official-historical-review-found-no-verifiable-evidence  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[America's missing scientists, 2021–2026](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/missing-scientists)Evidence

Evidence · America's missing scientists, 2021–2026

# The official historical review found no verifiable evidence of the programme

AARO's 2024 historical review found no verifiable evidence that the US government recovered or reverse-engineered non-human technology, and traced several such claims to misread real programmes.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[Yes: such a programme exists, and McCasland, at least, was close to it](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/missing-scientists/answers/ANS0DCQPPJRTBTW/yes-such-a-programme-exists-and-mccasland-at-least-was-close)

Still possible

AGAINST

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). The official historical review found no verifiable evidence of the programme [Evidence EVD0DCQS6T34KYW]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DCQS6T34KYW
```

Key

**EVD** 0DCQS6T34KYW

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0DCQS6T34KYW)