# Pottery could be late 16th century and is unlikely after 1650; early clay pipes are absent at Site Y.

> Pottery could be late 16th century and is unlikely after 1650; early clay pipes are absent at Site Y.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/lost-colony-roanoke/evidence/EVD0CQCCGCY2AF2/pottery-could-be-late-16th-century-and-is-unlikely-after  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Lost Colony of Roanoke](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/lost-colony-roanoke)Evidence

Evidence · Lost Colony of Roanoke

# Pottery could be late 16th century and is unlikely after 1650; early clay pipes are absent at Site Y.

Pottery could be late 16th century and is unlikely after 1650; early clay pipes are absent at Site Y.

Suggestive0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[Yes; they are parts of the colonists' dispersed settlement along the Chowan.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/lost-colony-roanoke/answers/ANS0CQCCFXA1S7A/yes-they-are-parts-of-the-colonists-dispersed-settlement)

Disputed

FOR

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). Pottery could be late 16th century and is unlikely after 1650; early clay pipes are absent at Site Y. [Evidence EVD0CQCCGCY2AF2]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0CQCCGCY2AF2
```

Key

**EVD** 0CQCCGCY2AF2

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Suggestive

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0CQCCGCY2AF2)