# A 2023 review describes prosaic explanations as the consensus of experts.

> A 2023 review describes prosaic explanations as the consensus of experts.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/loch-ness/evidence/EVD0CRFXEZ47YCM/a-2023-review-describes-prosaic-explanations-as-the  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Loch Ness](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/loch-ness)Evidence

Evidence · Loch Ness

# A 2023 review describes prosaic explanations as the consensus of experts.

A 2023 review describes prosaic explanations as the consensus of experts.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[A mixture of misidentified boats, wakes, debris, birds and other animals, optical and wind effects, and…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/loch-ness/answers/ANS0CRFXEFG5F53/a-mixture-of-misidentified-boats-wakes-debris-birds-and)

Most likely

FOR

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). A 2023 review describes prosaic explanations as the consensus of experts. [Evidence EVD0CRFXEZ47YCM]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0CRFXEZ47YCM
```

Key

**EVD** 0CRFXEZ47YCM

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0CRFXEZ47YCM)
