# None of these.

> Still possible: None of these.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/hattic-kassite-lost-languages/answers/ANS0DEDZBKS3HN9/none-of-these  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Questions](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions)[Hattic, Kassite and the half-read languages of the cuneiform archives](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/hattic-kassite-lost-languages)[Can anything of Gutian and Lullubian be recovered from names alone?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/hattic-kassite-lost-languages/questions/QST0DEDWKF82K3C/can-anything-of-gutian-and-lullubian-be-recovered-from-names)Answer

Answer · Hattic, Kassite and the half-read languages of the cuneiform archives

# None of these.

None of these.

**Still possible** Answers **1** question0

## Where it stands

**Still possible** No evidence yet. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

## Evidence none for · none against

[No classification other than Henning's has been put forward for Gutian, so the field of alternatives is untested…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/hattic-kassite-lost-languages/evidence/EVD0DEEBFFPJGSE/no-classification-other-than-hennings-has-been-put-forward)

Speculative

NEUTRAL

## The questions it answers

[Can anything of Gutian and Lullubian be recovered from names alone?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/hattic-kassite-lost-languages/questions/QST0DEDWKF82K3C/can-anything-of-gutian-and-lullubian-be-recovered-from-names)

Open3 answers, none ahead

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). None of these. [Answer ANS0DEDZBKS3HN9]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0DEDZBKS3HN9
```

Key

**ANS** 0DEDZBKS3HN9

Kind

Answer · hypothesis

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/ANS0DEDZBKS3HN9)