# A repertoire assembled from printed alphabet tables

> Still possible: The sign repertoire was assembled from printed Phoenician and Iberian alphabet tables available to Morlet, and grew as new tables reached…

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/answers/ANS0DEDX2DJJYXM/a-repertoire-assembled-from-printed-alphabet-tables  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Questions](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions)[Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel)[Which published alphabets do the Glozel signs resemble, and could a forger of the 1920s have drawn on them?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/questions/QST0DEDTR4X4Q7P/which-published-alphabets-do-the-glozel-signs-resemble-and)Answer

Answer · Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field

# A repertoire assembled from printed alphabet tables

The sign repertoire was assembled from printed Phoenician and Iberian alphabet tables available to Morlet, and grew as new tables reached him.

**Still possible** Answers **1** question0

## Where it stands

**Still possible** One piece of evidence for, one against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

## What it predicts

- Every sign in Morlet's table has a printed model in a handbook available in France before its first appearance at Glozel.
- The order of first appearance of sign types tracks the dates of publications in Morlet's hands.

## What would rule it out

- A substantial set of Glozel signs has no printed model before 1936 and matches an ancient script published only later.

## Evidence 1 for · 1 against

[Dussaud showed that the 22 letters on the first 21 tablets match the late Phoenician of the Eshmunazar sarcophagus and…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/evidence/EVD0DEDYWWND4HE/dussaud-showed-that-the-22-letters-on-the-first-21-tablets)

Supported

FOR

[Isserlin's 1976 comparison found the Glozel signs matched no single ancient alphabet closely, which a direct copy from…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/evidence/EVD0DEDYXWDVCMJ/isserlins-1976-comparison-found-the-glozel-signs-matched-no)

Speculative

AGAINST

## The questions it answers

[Which published alphabets do the Glozel signs resemble, and could a forger of the 1920s have drawn on them?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/questions/QST0DEDTR4X4Q7P/which-published-alphabets-do-the-glozel-signs-resemble-and)

OpenNo answer ahead yet

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). A repertoire assembled from printed alphabet tables [Answer ANS0DEDX2DJJYXM]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0DEDX2DJJYXM
```

Key

**ANS** 0DEDX2DJJYXM

Kind

Answer · hypothesis

Proposed

[Session 1](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/glozel/sessions/SES0DEEA8YVZY8C/session-1-glozel-seeded-corpus-readings-and-open-data) · 31 Oct 2026

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/ANS0DEDX2DJJYXM)