# Fast radio bursts and the origin of the one-off bursts > Fast radio bursts are millisecond flashes of radio waves from other galaxies, thousands of which are now catalogued. In 2020 a burst from a magnetar in… Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts Publisher: Mysteries Department Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page) Updated: 2026-10-27T17:47:23+00:00 --- **MYS** 0CVCM6RE3JKJ·Mystery · signal # Fast radio bursts and the origin of the one-off bursts **0** [Follow][Ask a question](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions/key-questions?mystery=fast-radio-bursts) Fast radio bursts and the origin of the one-off bursts ![Observation of the first detected fast radio burst as described by Lorimer et al.](https://mysteriesdept.com/media/folio/fast-radio-bursts-lead) Psr1909 · CC BY-SA 4.0 First found The Lorimer burst, found in archival Parkes pulsar-survey data and reported in 2007⁠[[1]] Duration Milliseconds or less⁠[[1]] Distance Extragalactic; localised hosts range from a globular cluster of the nearby galaxy M81 to redshift 1⁠[[26]] Catalogued 4,539 bursts from 3,641 sources in CHIME/FRB Catalog 2 (2018–2023), 83 of them repeating⁠[[3]] First repeater FRB 121102, 2016⁠[[4]] Galactic burst FRB 200428 from the magnetar SGR 1935+2154, 28 April 2020⁠[[6]] Latest FRB 20250316A, the brightest nearby one-off, localised to NGC 4141 with no persistent radio source⁠[[12]] Status Partly explained Questions 0 of 5 answered People [**Duncan R. Lorimer** Astronomer, West Virginia University; reported the first burst](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/people/FIG0CVCM7QP7MAP/duncan-r-lorimer)[**Laura G. Spitler** Lead author of the discovery of the first repeater](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/people/FIG0CVCM7ZG1D6D/laura-g-spitler) Catalog key**MYS** 0CVCM6RE3JKJ A fast radio burst is a pulse of radio waves lasting a few milliseconds or less. The first was reported in 2007 by Duncan Lorimer and colleagues, who found it in archival pulsar-survey data from the Parkes telescope: a single 30 Jy burst near the Small Magellanic Cloud, whose low frequencies arrived later than its high frequencies by an amount that implied it had crossed far more intergalactic plasma than our Galaxy contains⁠[[1]]. The delay, the dispersion measure, is the signature of an extragalactic origin. Four more bursts in 2013 showed a population at cosmological distances⁠[[2]]. Since 2018 the CHIME telescope in British Columbia has found them by the thousand: its second catalogue lists 4,539 bursts from 3,641 sources⁠[[3]]. Two discoveries narrowed the question. In 2016 one source, FRB 121102, was seen to repeat, so whatever made it survived the event⁠[[4]]. In April 2020 CHIME and the STARE2 array detected a burst from SGR 1935+2154, a magnetar inside the Milky Way: about a thousand times more energetic than any earlier radio burst from a magnetar and close enough in energy to the weakest extragalactic bursts that, seen from another galaxy, it would have counted as one⁠[[5]]⁠[[6]]. At least some fast radio bursts are made by magnetars, neutron stars with surface magnetic fields above 10¹⁴ gauss⁠[[6]]. Most sources have been seen only once, and for these the origin is not settled. Repeater bursts are wider and narrower in frequency than one-off bursts, which may mean different sources or a different viewing geometry⁠[[7]]. A repeater in an old globular cluster and another in a dead elliptical galaxy do not fit magnetars born recently in supernovae⁠[[8]]⁠[[9]]. In 2025 two studies of a one-off burst found its emitting region no more than about 30,000 km across and its polarisation swinging as a pulsar's does, both pointing to emission from a neutron star's magnetosphere⁠[[10]]⁠[[11]]. The brightest nearby one-off, FRB 20250316A, has no persistent radio source of the kind seen around active repeaters⁠[[12]]. Of the 5 questions on this site, 0 are answered. The most likely answer to “What produces most of the one-off fast radio bursts?”, not yet confirmed: magnetars or other neutron stars formed late, by mergers of neutron stars or white dwarfs or by the collapse…. ### Key questionsset by the editors [**Are repeating and one-off sources one population or several?** ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMBMP0WB0/are-repeating-and-one-off-sources-one-population-or-several)No answer ahead yet [**What produces most of the one-off fast radio bursts?** ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMB5213XT/what-produces-most-of-the-one-off-fast-radio-bursts)Most likely: magnetars or other neutron stars formed late, by mergers of neutron stars or white dwarfs or by the collapse… [All 5 questions ](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions/key-questions?mystery=fast-radio-bursts) ## What happened The Lorimer burst was found in archival Parkes survey data: a burst shorter than 5 ms at 30 Jy, three degrees from the Small Magellanic Cloud, with no repeat in 90 hours of later observations⁠[[1]]. In 2013 Thornton and colleagues reported four more from the High Time Resolution Universe survey, all far from the Galactic plane, with dispersion measures implying redshifts of 0.5 to 1⁠[[2]]. [![Gemini North image of the host galaxy of FRB 121102](https://mysteriesdept.com/files/v/0c0ee9a6f3e3b924b2f523585685957625d8aee9eb33308cdccac27e17d274a3/w800)](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMSJ02D52/gemini-north-image-of-the-host-galaxy-of-frb-121102) Gemini North image of the host galaxy of FRB 121102Gemini Observatory, 2016. CC BY 4.0[Artifact ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMSJ02D52/gemini-north-image-of-the-host-galaxy-of-frb-121102) In 2016 Arecibo observations found ten further bursts from the position of FRB 121102, the first known repeater⁠[[4]]. In 2017 the Very Large Array localised it to a faint galaxy, beside a compact, variable persistent radio source⁠[[13]]. In 2019 ASKAP and the Deep Synoptic Array prototype localised one-off bursts to massive galaxies⁠[[14]]⁠[[15]]. In 2020 CHIME found that the repeater FRB 180916.J0158+65 is active in a 5-day window of a 16.35-day cycle⁠[[16]], and on 28 April 2020 the magnetar SGR 1935+2154 produced FRB 200428, detected by CHIME at 400–800 MHz and by STARE2 at 1.3–1.5 GHz⁠[[5]]⁠[[6]]. **Map of the world** [Open the full map](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/map) [+][−] 1 **CHIME at the Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, near Penticton, British Columbia** Radio telescope Mapped 2 **Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, New Mexico** Radio telescope array Within 1 km 3 **Gemini North telescope, Maunakea, Hawaii** Optical telescope Mapped 4 **Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico** Radio telescope (305 m dish collapsed 2020) Within 1 km 5 **Parkes radio telescope (Murriyang), New South Wales** Radio telescope Within 1 km MappedWithin 1 kmNatural Earth ### Timeline **Timeline** Squeezed where little happened. Each mark is a published claim, by how it stands:AcceptedMost likelyStill possibleDisputedRuled out ## The accounts There are no witnesses; the record is the published detections and their catalogues. The CHIME/FRB Collaboration's two catalogues are the largest uniform accounts of the population, the first with 536 bursts from its first year and the second with 4,539 from five years⁠[[17]]⁠[[3]]. Reviews by Petroff, Hessels and Lorimer, and by Zhang, set out what the observations established by the early 2020s and how the theories divide⁠[[18]]⁠[[19]]. A catalogue of theories assembled in 2019 records how many progenitor models were in play before the magnetar detection⁠[[20]]. ## What was recorded A burst is recorded as a dynamic spectrum: intensity against time and frequency. From it come the dispersion measure, the width, the scattering time, the fluence and, for well-recorded bursts, polarisation. CHIME records every burst at 400–800 MHz with 0.983 ms resolution, a position to about 10 arcminutes, and the exposure and sensitivity needed to turn counts into rates⁠[[3]]. Its first catalogue calibrated selection effects by injecting simulated bursts into the live pipeline⁠[[17]]. Both catalogues are public as tables, with waterfall data, the beam model and injection data for Catalog 1⁠[[21]]⁠[[22]]⁠[[23]]. Localisation to host galaxies is the second record. Interferometers (ASKAP, the Deep Synoptic Array, the VLA, European VLBI and, by 2024, the CHIME Outriggers) place bursts to arcseconds or better, which gives a host galaxy and a redshift⁠[[14]]⁠[[24]]⁠[[9]]. With redshifts, the dispersion measure becomes a measure of the ionised gas between galaxies⁠[[25]]. The most distant localised burst so far is FRB 20220610A at redshift 1.016, with an energy of 2 × 10⁴² erg⁠[[26]]. [![Gemini North image of the host galaxy of FRB 180916.J0158+65](https://mysteriesdept.com/files/v/0f890c4b1a0d537144fdf08b9772641d0df68939514371f2a2ad09cd3c4a78f8/w800)](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMT1M4GVS/gemini-north-image-of-the-host-galaxy-of-frb-180916-j0158-65) Gemini North image of the host galaxy of FRB 180916.J0158+65Gemini Observatory, 2020. CC BY 4.0[Artifact ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMT1M4GVS/gemini-north-image-of-the-host-galaxy-of-frb-180916-j0158-65) The record for the one-off bursts includes three recent kinds of measurement. Scintillation in FRB 20221022A limited the size of its emitting region⁠[[10]]; its polarisation angle swung by 130 degrees in 2.5 ms in the pattern pulsars show⁠[[11]]. Deep radio imaging of the brightest nearby one-off, FRB 20250316A in NGC 4141 at about 40 Mpc, found no persistent radio source to a limit three orders of magnitude below those around active repeaters⁠[[12]], while hydrogen imaging found a recent starburst in the burst's part of the galaxy⁠[[27]]. ## The explanations Magnetars are the leading explanation. The Galactic burst of 2020 showed that a magnetar can produce a burst of the right duration and close to the right energy⁠[[5]]⁠[[6]]. The 2025 scintillation and polarisation results place the emission of one one-off burst inside or just outside a neutron-star magnetosphere and disfavour models in which emission arises in shocks far from the source⁠[[10]]⁠[[11]]. Hosts are mostly star-forming galaxies, and massive ones are over-represented⁠[[24]]. How the magnetars form is the open part. A magnetar born in a core-collapse supernova is young and should sit among young stars. FRB 20200120E sits in a globular cluster of M81, whose stars are billions of years old⁠[[8]]; FRB 20240209A sits in a quiescent elliptical galaxy with a stellar age of about 11 billion years⁠[[9]]. The population as a whole appears delayed relative to cosmic star formation⁠[[28]]. These point to a second channel: magnetars made by neutron-star or white-dwarf mergers, or by the collapse of a white dwarf, or sources that are not magnetars at all, such as accreting binaries⁠[[9]]. Whether repeaters and one-offs are one population is the other open part. Repeater bursts are wider and narrower in bandwidth on average⁠[[7]], but the two groups share sky distribution and dispersion measures⁠[[17]]. If every source repeats given time, the difference could be selection; machine-learning classifiers flag dozens of apparent one-offs as likely repeaters⁠[[29]]. If some bursts are truly single, cataclysmic models (mergers, collapses) remain possible for them, as the earliest papers suggested⁠[[1]]⁠[[30]]. The brightest one-offs may also be a distinct class: an extreme-value analysis of Catalog 2 finds FRB 20250316A outside the bounded distribution of the rest⁠[[31]]. ### Published claims **Published claims and their status** | Year | Who | Claimed | Status | Reason | |---|---|---|---|---| | 2007 | Duncan Lorimer and colleagues⁠[1] | A single 30 Jy millisecond burst in Parkes survey data came from outside the Galaxy, at a distance of under 1 Gpc. | Accepted | Bursts have since been localised to host galaxies out to redshift 1⁠[13]⁠[26]. | | 2011 | Sarah Burke-Spolaor and colleagues⁠[33] | Terrestrial pulses at Parkes with the same frequency sweep as the Lorimer burst cast doubt on its extragalactic origin. | Ruled out | The pulses were traced to microwave ovens that could not have made the bursts, and bursts have since been localised to other galaxies⁠[32]⁠[13]. | | 2013 | Dan Thornton and colleagues⁠[2] | Four more bursts far from the Galactic plane show a population of sources at cosmological distances. | Accepted | CHIME has since catalogued 3,641 sources, and localised hosts reach redshift 1⁠[3]⁠[26]. | | 2015 | Emily Petroff and colleagues⁠[32] | The peryton pulses at Parkes come from microwave ovens opened early, which could not have produced the fast radio bursts. | Accepted | The cause was reproduced on site, and later bursts have been localised to host galaxies⁠[32]⁠[13]. | | 2016 | Laura Spitler and colleagues⁠[4] | FRB 121102 repeats, so at least one source survives its bursts and cannot be a one-time cataclysm. | Accepted | The source has repeated many times since and was localised to a host galaxy⁠[13]. | | 2017 | Manasvi Lingam and Abraham Loeb⁠[34] | Fast radio bursts could be leakage from beams that extragalactic civilisations use to drive light sails. | Disputed | No observation tests it directly, but a magnetar was seen to make a burst in 2020 and one-off bursts have since been traced to neutron-star magnetospheres⁠[6]⁠[10]. | | 2017 | Shami Chatterjee and colleagues⁠[13] | The repeater FRB 121102 lies in a faint galaxy beside a compact, variable radio source, which settles its extragalactic origin. | Accepted | Dozens of bursts have since been placed in host galaxies by several arrays⁠[14]⁠[9]. | | 2019 | Brian Metzger, Ben Margalit and Lorenzo Sironi⁠[35] | Bursts are synchrotron maser emission from shocks where flare ejecta from a young magnetar hit material from earlier flares. | Disputed | The small emitting region and the pulsar-like polarisation swing of FRB 20221022A disfavour emission far from the star, though the model may still apply to some bursts⁠[10]⁠[11]. | | 2020 | Christopher Bochenek and colleagues⁠[6] | The burst FRB 200428 from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 shows that magnetars can make fast radio bursts and may make the extragalactic ones. | Most likely | The Galactic burst is accepted, but sources in a globular cluster and a dead galaxy do not fit magnetars born recently in supernovae⁠[8]⁠[9]. | | 2021 | Ziggy Pleunis and colleagues⁠[7] | Bursts from repeaters are wider in time and narrower in frequency than one-off bursts, which may mean different sources. | Still possible | The difference is measured, but the two groups share sky and dispersion distributions and could differ by viewing angle or selection⁠[17]⁠[29]. | | 2022 | Franz Kirsten and colleagues⁠[8] | The repeater FRB 20200120E sits in an old globular cluster of M81, so some sources formed late, by a merger or the collapse of a white dwarf. | Most likely | The localisation holds, and a second repeater in an old elliptical galaxy points the same way⁠[9]. | | 2025 | Kenzie Nimmo and colleagues⁠[10] | Scintillation limits the emitting region of the one-off FRB 20221022A to about 30,000 km, inside or just outside a neutron star's magnetosphere. | Most likely | An independent polarisation study of the same burst reached the same conclusion, but it is one burst⁠[11]. | | 2025 | Ryan Mckinven and colleagues⁠[11] | The polarisation angle of FRB 20221022A swings by 130 degrees in the pattern of a rotating pulsar, so the emission comes from a magnetosphere. | Most likely | It agrees with the scintillation result for the same burst, though no wider sample of one-offs has been measured⁠[10]. | | 2025 | Tarraneh Eftekhari and colleagues⁠[9] | The repeater FRB 20240209A lies in a quiescent elliptical galaxy about 11 billion years old, which points to a source channel other than the collapse of massive stars. | Most likely | With the globular-cluster repeater it makes two old hosts, and the burst rate as a whole lags star formation⁠[8]⁠[28]. | | 2025 | N. Mankatwit and colleagues⁠[29] | A machine-learning classifier flags 36 apparent one-off sources in CHIME data as likely repeaters. | Still possible | The candidates have not yet been shown to repeat by follow-up observation⁠[29]. | | 2026 | Wen-Long Zhang and Jun-Jie Wei⁠[31] | FRB 20250316A lies far beyond the upper bound of the fluence distribution of the other Catalog 2 bursts, so the brightest one-offs may be a separate class. | Still possible | It rests on one outlier, which also lacks the persistent radio source seen around active repeaters⁠[12]. | ## What would settle it For the one-off population the decisive data are localisations by the hundred with host properties and offsets, which CHIME's Outriggers now provide, combined with long monitoring of each position to measure the fraction that repeat. A second Galactic or very nearby burst with simultaneous X-ray coverage would test the magnetar mechanism directly. A one-off burst caught with a gravitational-wave signal or a supernova would establish a cataclysmic channel; the absence of any such coincidence over many nearby bursts would weaken it. Polarisation and scintillation measurements for many one-off bursts would show whether a magnetospheric origin is the rule. ## Questions 0 of 5 questions are answered. **Key questions** [All 5](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions/key-questions?mystery=fast-radio-bursts) **0** [Are repeating and one-off sources one population or several?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMBMP0WB0/are-repeating-and-one-off-sources-one-population-or-several) 0 of 1 sub-questions answered·0 Open: 3 answers, none ahead **0** [What produces most of the one-off fast radio bursts?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMB5213XT/what-produces-most-of-the-one-off-fast-radio-bursts) 0 of 2 sub-questions answered·0 Most likely: magnetars or other neutron stars formed late, by mergers of neutron stars or white dwarfs or by the collapse… ## Evidence 22 findings [What produces most of the one-off fast radio bursts?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMB5213XT/what-produces-most-of-the-one-off-fast-radio-bursts)11 findings [Young magnetars born in core-collapse supernovae of massive stars.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMCC44013/young-magnetars-born-in-core-collapse-supernovae-of-massive)Most likely +[A Galactic magnetar produced a burst within a factor of about 40 of the weakest extragalactic FRB energies.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMCKY6QJH/a-galactic-magnetar-produced-a-burst-within-a-factor-of)Established +[Scintillation and a pulsar-like polarisation swing place the emission of one-off FRB 20221022A in a neutron-star magnetosphere.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMCVR5JEN/scintillation-and-a-pulsar-like-polarisation-swing-place-the)Supported +[Hosts of 30 localised bursts are star-forming and biased to massive galaxies.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMD3J0X87/hosts-of-30-localised-bursts-are-star-forming-and-biased-to)Supported −[The redshift distribution of Catalog 1 bursts is significantly delayed relative to star formation.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMDBC30WY/the-redshift-distribution-of-catalog-1-bursts-is)Suggestive −[FRB 20250316A has no persistent radio source to limits three orders of magnitude below active repeaters, disfavouring a bright young-magnetar nebula for it.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMDK64SAQ/frb-20250316a-has-no-persistent-radio-source-to-limits-three)Suggestive [Magnetars or other neutron stars formed late, by mergers of neutron stars or white dwarfs or by the collapse…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMDV016SX/magnetars-or-other-neutron-stars-formed-late-by-mergers-of)Most likely +[FRB 20200120E lies in a globular cluster of M81.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCME2T5N8K/frb-20200120e-lies-in-a-globular-cluster-of-m81)Established +[FRB 20240209A lies in a quiescent elliptical galaxy with a stellar age of about 11 billion years.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMEAM4BC5/frb-20240209a-lies-in-a-quiescent-elliptical-galaxy-with-a)Established −[Both of these old-population sources are repeaters, so their bearing on one-off bursts is indirect.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMEJE5CDD/both-of-these-old-population-sources-are-repeaters-so-their)Supported [Truly single events that destroy or transform their source, such as compact-object mergers or collapses.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMET8031G/truly-single-events-that-destroy-or-transform-their-source)Still possible +[The first burst did not repeat in 90 hours, and its discoverers proposed a singular event such as a supernova or a coalescence.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMF2208XM/the-first-burst-did-not-repeat-in-90-hours-and-its)Speculative −[Repeaters prove that at least some sources survive their bursts.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMF9W6EVT/repeaters-prove-that-at-least-some-sources-survive-their)Established [Accreting compact binaries, such as luminous X-ray binaries, rather than isolated magnetars.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMFHP7PRT/accreting-compact-binaries-such-as-luminous-x-ray-binaries)Still possible +[A 16.35-day activity cycle in FRB 180916.J0158+65 suggests orbital or precessional modulation.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMFSG1WHT/a-16-35-day-activity-cycle-in-frb-180916-j0158-65-suggests)Suggestive [Is the radio emission made in the neutron star's magnetosphere or in shocks far from it?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMBCW2KQH/is-the-radio-emission-made-in-the-neutron-stars)4 findings [Coherent emission within or just beyond a neutron-star magnetosphere.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMG941PMC/coherent-emission-within-or-just-beyond-a-neutron-star)Most likely +[FRB 20221022A has a lateral emitting region under about 3 × 10⁴ km.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMGGY7MPZ/frb-20221022a-has-a-lateral-emitting-region-under-about-3)Supported +[FRB 20221022A shows a 130 degree S-shaped polarisation swing fitted by the rotating vector model.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMGRR0E55/frb-20221022a-shows-a-130-degree-s-shaped-polarisation-swing)Supported [Synchrotron maser emission from shocks at large distances from the central engine.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMH0J4F7D/synchrotron-maser-emission-from-shocks-at-large-distances)Disputed +[The SGR 1935+2154 burst coincided with an X-ray burst, which STARE2 noted favours synchrotron-maser or magnetar-pulse models.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMH8C1533/the-sgr-1935-2154-burst-coincided-with-an-x-ray-burst-which)Suggestive −[The FRB 20221022A scintillation result is inconsistent with large-radius models.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMHG64RDA/the-frb-20221022a-scintillation-result-is-inconsistent-with)Supported [Are repeating and one-off sources one population or several?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMBMP0WB0/are-repeating-and-one-off-sources-one-population-or-several)4 findings [All sources repeat; apparent one-offs are repeaters whose other bursts have not been seen, and differences…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMHZT5NMN/all-sources-repeat-apparent-one-offs-are-repeaters-whose)Still possible +[Repeaters and apparent non-repeaters share sky positions and dispersion measures.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMJ7M662X/repeaters-and-apparent-non-repeaters-share-sky-positions-and)Supported +[A semi-supervised classifier flags 36 apparent one-off sources as repeater candidates.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMJFE2CVC/a-semi-supervised-classifier-flags-36-apparent-one-off)Suggestive [Repeaters and one-off sources are physically different classes.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMJQ83ECS/repeaters-and-one-off-sources-are-physically-different)Still possible +[Repeater bursts are on average wider in time and narrower in bandwidth.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMJZ20SYF/repeater-bursts-are-on-average-wider-in-time-and-narrower-in)Supported +[Persistent radio sources surround some active repeaters but not the bright one-off FRB 20250316A.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMK6W4BKM/persistent-radio-sources-surround-some-active-repeaters-but)Suggestive [Are the brightest one-off bursts the tail of one distribution or a separate class?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMBWG1P3D/are-the-brightest-one-off-bursts-the-tail-of-one)2 findings [The brightest bursts are the heavy tail of a single luminosity distribution.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMKPG3V4Q/the-brightest-bursts-are-the-heavy-tail-of-a-single)Still possible +[The full peak-flux sample fits an unbounded Fréchet-type distribution.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMKYA2YKV/the-full-peak-flux-sample-fits-an-unbounded-frechet-type)Suggestive [The brightest one-offs are a distinct physical class.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMM641XHQ/the-brightest-one-offs-are-a-distinct-physical-class)Still possible +[With three other outliers removed, the fluence distribution is bounded and FRB 20250316A far exceeds the bound.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMMDY65ZN/with-three-other-outliers-removed-the-fluence-distribution)Suggestive [How do burst sources come to be in old star clusters and dead galaxies?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/questions/QST0CVCMC4A44GR/how-do-burst-sources-come-to-be-in-old-star-clusters-and)1 finding [Magnetars formed by mergers of neutron stars or white dwarfs, or by accretion-induced collapse of a white…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/answers/ANS0CVCMMXJ4KG0/magnetars-formed-by-mergers-of-neutron-stars-or-white-dwarfs)Still possible +[FRB 20240209A has a large offset and a host like those of short gamma-ray bursts.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/evidence/EVD0CVCMN5C4QQG/frb-20240209a-has-a-large-offset-and-a-host-like-those-of)Suggestive ## Artifacts The films, photos, papers and objects this mystery rests on, each with its own key and its distance from the original. **Artifacts** [See all 13](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts) Document2 steps from object [The Lorimer burst (FRB 20010724A) in the Parkes multibeam survey data](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMR34678F/the-lorimer-burst-frb-20010724a-in-the-parkes-multibeam) Lorimer, Bailes, McLaughlin, Narkevic and Crawford · publisher Document2 steps from object [Arecibo recordings of FRB 121102, the first repeating burst](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMRTJ23SE/arecibo-recordings-of-frb-121102-the-first-repeating-burst) Spitler and colleagues · publisher Photo1 step from object [Gemini North image of the host galaxy of FRB 121102](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMSJ02D52/gemini-north-image-of-the-host-galaxy-of-frb-121102) Gemini Observatory/AURA/NSF/NRC · CC BY 4.0 Photo1 step from object [Gemini North image of the host galaxy of FRB 180916.J0158+65](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMT1M4GVS/gemini-north-image-of-the-host-galaxy-of-frb-180916-j0158-65) Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA · CC BY 4.0 Document2 steps from object [CHIME and STARE2 recordings of FRB 200428 from the magnetar SGR 1935+2154](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMTH84F5K/chime-and-stare2-recordings-of-frb-200428-from-the-magnetar) CHIME/FRB Collaboration · publisher Dataset1 step from object [CHIME/FRB Catalog 1 waterfall data (536 bursts, 2018–2019)](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMV8P2PSP/chime-frb-catalog-1-waterfall-data-536-bursts-20182019) CHIME/FRB Collaboration · open use; cite the CHIME/FRB papers Dataset1 step from object [CHIME/FRB Catalog 2 (4,539 bursts, 2018–2023)](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts/ART0CVCMVRA3BXY/chime-frb-catalog-2-4-539-bursts-20182023) CHIME/FRB Collaboration · open use; cite the CHIME/FRB papers [See all 13 artifacts](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/fast-radio-bursts/artifacts) ## See also [ **Wow! signal** A 72-second radio signal recorded by Ohio State's Big Ear telescope in August 1977. ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/wow-signal) [ **Phosphine in the clouds of Venus** A 2020 report of phosphine gas in the clouds of Venus, not independently confirmed. ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/venus-phosphine) [ **HD 139139, the "Random Transiter"** A Sun-like star whose light dipped 28 times at random in 87 days of K2 data in 2017. ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/hd-139139-random-transiter) [ **Bloop and NOAA's unexplained ocean sounds** Loud low-frequency sounds, the Bloop among them, recorded by NOAA in the 1990s. ](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/noaa-ocean-sounds) ## References 1. 1.[Lorimer, D., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. et al. 2007. A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin. Science 318(5851), 777–780.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCKYYE0TS8/a-bright-millisecond-radio-burst-of-extragalactic-origin)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147532)cited 8 times here**SRC** 0CVCKYYE0TS8 1. 2.[Thornton, D., Stappers, B., Bailes, M. et al. 2013. A Population of Fast Radio Bursts at Cosmological Distances. Science 341(6141), 53–56.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCKZ683M68/a-population-of-fast-radio-bursts-at-cosmological-distances)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236789)cited 2 times here**SRC** 0CVCKZ683M68 1. 3.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Abbott, T., Andersen, B. et al. 2026. The Second CHIME/FRB Catalog of Fast Radio Bursts. arXiv.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM1W62AJ7/the-second-chime-frb-catalog-of-fast-radio-bursts)cited 5 times here**SRC** 0CVCM1W62AJ7 1. 4.[Spitler, L., Scholz, P., Hessels, J. et al. 2016. A repeating fast radio burst. Nature 531(7593), 202–205.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCKZE21K58/a-repeating-fast-radio-burst)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17168)cited 8 times here**SRC** 0CVCKZE21K58 1. 5.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Andersen, B., Bandura, K. et al. 2020. A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar. Nature 587(7832), 54–58.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM0WY7W89/a-bright-millisecond-duration-radio-burst-from-a-galactic)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y)cited 5 times here**SRC** 0CVCM0WY7W89 1. 6.[Bochenek, C., Ravi, V., Belov, K. et al. 2020. A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar. Nature 587(7832), 59–62.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM14R24B3/a-fast-radio-burst-associated-with-a-galactic-magnetar)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x)cited 4 times here**SRC** 0CVCM14R24B3 1. 7.[Pleunis, Z., Good, D., Kaspi, V. et al. 2021. Fast Radio Burst Morphology in the First CHIME/FRB Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal 923(1), 1.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM1MC6R9J/fast-radio-burst-morphology-in-the-first-chime-frb-catalog)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac33ac)cited 3 times here**SRC** 0CVCM1MC6R9J 1. 8.[Kirsten, F., Marcote, B., Nimmo, K. et al. 2022. A repeating fast radio burst source in a globular cluster. Nature 602(7898), 585–589.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM2VE02T4/a-repeating-fast-radio-burst-source-in-a-globular-cluster)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04354-w)cited 7 times here**SRC** 0CVCM2VE02T4 1. 9.[Eftekhari, T., Dong, Y., Fong, W. et al. 2025. The Massive and Quiescent Elliptical Host Galaxy of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 20240209A. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 979(2), L22.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM51R7G8W/the-massive-and-quiescent-elliptical-host-galaxy-of-the)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad9de2)cited 8 times here**SRC** 0CVCM51R7G8W 1. 10.[Nimmo, K., Pleunis, Z., Beniamini, P. et al. 2025. Magnetospheric origin of a fast radio burst constrained using scintillation. Nature 637(8044), 48–51.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM4AA591W/magnetospheric-origin-of-a-fast-radio-burst-constrained)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08297-w)cited 6 times here**SRC** 0CVCM4AA591W 1. 11.[Mckinven, R., Bhardwaj, M., Eftekhari, T. et al. 2025. A pulsar-like polarization angle swing from a nearby fast radio burst. Nature 637(8044), 43–47.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM4J45ACR/a-pulsar-like-polarization-angle-swing-from-a-nearby-fast)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08184-4)cited 2 times here**SRC** 0CVCM4J45ACR 1. 12.[An, T., Wang, A., Huang, Y. et al. 2025. A Deep VLA Search for a Persistent Radio Counterpart to the One-off FRB 20250316A. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 991(1), L20.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM59J59FZ/a-deep-vla-search-for-a-persistent-radio-counterpart-to-the)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae0324)cited 4 times here**SRC** 0CVCM59J59FZ 1. 13.[Chatterjee, S., Law, C., Wharton, R. et al. 2017. A direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host. Nature 541(7635), 58–61.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCKZNW6W6R/a-direct-localization-of-a-fast-radio-burst-and-its-host)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20797)cited 2 times here**SRC** 0CVCKZNW6W6R 1. 14.[Bannister, K., Deller, A., Phillips, C. et al. 2019. A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance. Science 365(6453), 565–570.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCKZXP2MJG/a-single-fast-radio-burst-localized-to-a-massive-galaxy-at)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw5903)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCKZXP2MJG 1. 15.[Ravi, V., Catha, M., D'Addario, L. et al. 2019. A fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy. Nature 572(7769), 352–354.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM05G2CWJ/a-fast-radio-burst-localized-to-a-massive-galaxy)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1389-7)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM05G2CWJ 1. 16.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. et al. 2020. Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source. Nature 582(7812), 351–355.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM0DA5B6X/periodic-activity-from-a-fast-radio-burst-source)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2398-2)cited 3 times here**SRC** 0CVCM0DA5B6X 1. 17.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. et al. 2021. The First CHIME/FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 257(2), 59.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM1CJ2F7B/the-first-chime-frb-fast-radio-burst-catalog)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac33ab)cited 6 times here**SRC** 0CVCM1CJ2F7B 1. 18.[Petroff, E., Hessels, J., Lorimer, D. 2022. Fast radio bursts at the dawn of the 2020s. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 30(1), 2.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM3B22CES/fast-radio-bursts-at-the-dawn-of-the-2020s)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-022-00139-w)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM3B22CES 1. 19.[Zhang, B. 2020. The physical mechanisms of fast radio bursts. Nature 587(7832), 45–53.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM3JW4V3J/the-physical-mechanisms-of-fast-radio-bursts)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2828-1)cited 4 times here**SRC** 0CVCM3JW4V3J 1. 20.[Platts, E., Weltman, A., Walters, A. et al. 2019. A living theory catalogue for fast radio bursts. Physics Reports 821, 1–27.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM3TP26D8/a-living-theory-catalogue-for-fast-radio-bursts)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.06.003)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM3TP26D8 1. 21.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration 2026. CHIME/FRB Catalog 2 data release, version 20251231. Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (CANFAR) and chime-frb.ca.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM2405N0F/chime-frb-catalog-2-data-release-version-20251231)[doi](https://doi.org/10.11570/25.0066)cited 4 times here**SRC** 0CVCM2405N0F 1. 22.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration 2021. CHIME/FRB Catalog 1 data release, version 210806.vFINAL. Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (CANFAR) and chime-frb.ca.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM2BT281W/chime-frb-catalog-1-data-release-version-210806-vfinal)[doi](https://doi.org/10.11570/21.0007)cited 4 times here**SRC** 0CVCM2BT281W 1. 23.[CHIME/FRB Collaboration 2026. CHIME/FRB Open Data. chime-frb-open-data.github.io.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM2KM0NQJ/chime-frb-open-data)cited 3 times here**SRC** 0CVCM2KM0NQJ 1. 24.[Sharma, K., Ravi, V., Connor, L. et al. 2024. Preferential occurrence of fast radio bursts in massive star-forming galaxies. Nature 635(8037), 61–66.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM4SY6Y41/preferential-occurrence-of-fast-radio-bursts-in-massive-star)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08074-9)cited 2 times here**SRC** 0CVCM4SY6Y41 1. 25.[Macquart, J., Prochaska, J., McQuinn, M. et al. 2020. A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts. Nature 581(7809), 391–395.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM0N42QY8/a-census-of-baryons-in-the-universe-from-localized-fast)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM0N42QY8 1. 26.[Ryder, S., Bannister, K., Bhandari, S. et al. 2023. A luminous fast radio burst that probes the Universe at redshift 1. Science 382(6668), 294–299.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM3387BZ7/a-luminous-fast-radio-burst-that-probes-the-universe-at)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf2678)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM3387BZ7 1. 27.[Kaur, B., Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. 2026. High-resolution Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope H I 21 cm Imaging of the Host Galaxy of FRB 20250316A. The Astrophysical Journal 1001(2), 141.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM5HC7SJ3/high-resolution-giant-metrewave-radio-telescope-h-i-21-cm)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae4d4a)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM5HC7SJ3 1. 28.[Zhou, H., Li, Z., Zhu, Z. 2025. Constraints on Fast Radio Burst Population from the First CHIME/FRB Catalog with the Hierarchical Bayesian Inference. The Astrophysical Journal 989(1), 124.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM6105K31/constraints-on-fast-radio-burst-population-from-the-first)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adee15)cited 3 times here**SRC** 0CVCM6105K31 1. 29.[Mankatwit, N., Thongkonsing, P., Loekkesee, S. et al. 2025. Revealing hidden repeaters in the CHIME/FRB catalogue: semisupervised insights into the fast radio burst population. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 545(3), staf2178.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM68T48MA/revealing-hidden-repeaters-in-the-chime-frb-catalogue)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf2178)cited 2 times here**SRC** 0CVCM68T48MA 1. 30.[Caleb, M., Spitler, L., Stappers, B. 2018. One or several populations of fast radio burst sources?. Nature Astronomy 2(11), 839–841.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM42G79FB/one-or-several-populations-of-fast-radio-burst-sources)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0612-z)cited 3 times here**SRC** 0CVCM42G79FB 1. 31.[Zhang, W., Wei, J. 2026. Extreme-value Distribution Analysis of the Second CHIME/FRB Catalog: Assessing the Rarity of the One-off FRB 20250316A. The Astrophysical Journal 1002(2), 124.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM5S65R1R/extreme-value-distribution-analysis-of-the-second-chime-frb)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e74)cited 6 times here**SRC** 0CVCM5S65R1R 1. 32.[Petroff, E., Keane, E., Barr, E. et al. 2015. Identifying the source of perytons at the Parkes radio telescope. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451(4), 3933–3940.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM7FW5C4Z/identifying-the-source-of-perytons-at-the-parkes-radio)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1242)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM7FW5C4Z 1. 33.[Burke-Spolaor, S., Bailes, M., Ekers, R. et al. 2011. Radio Bursts with Extragalactic Spectral Characteristics Show Terrestrial Origins. The Astrophysical Journal 727(1), 18.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM78242ZY/radio-bursts-with-extragalactic-spectral-characteristics)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/18)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM78242ZY 1. 34.[Lingam, M., Loeb, A. 2017. Fast Radio Bursts from Extragalactic Light Sails. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 837(2), L23.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM7QP59N2/fast-radio-bursts-from-extragalactic-light-sails)[doi](https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa633e)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM7QP59N2 1. 35.[Metzger, B., Margalit, B., Sironi, L. 2019. Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485(3), 4091–4106.](https://mysteriesdept.com/sources/SRC0CVCM7ZG6VZH/fast-radio-bursts-as-synchrotron-maser-emission-from)[doi](https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz700)cited 1 time here**SRC** 0CVCM7ZG6VZH Last edited 27 Oct 2026