# No assemblage has a dated stratigraphy or absolute date

> The missions of 1999 to 2006 produced no study of the material, no substantial stratigraphy and no absolute dates, and the region has no Palaeolithic…

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara/evidence/EVD0DCKW9A4ABX1/no-assemblage-has-a-dated-stratigraphy-or-absolute-date  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Eye of the Sahara and Atlantis](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara)Evidence

Evidence · Eye of the Sahara and Atlantis

# No assemblage has a dated stratigraphy or absolute date

The missions of 1999 to 2006 produced no study of the material, no substantial stratigraphy and no absolute dates, and the region has no Palaeolithic stratigraphy on which to build a chronology.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[Yes: some Richat pebble-tool sites are a separate industry older than the Acheulean](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara/answers/ANS0DCKW1EGEY5B/yes-some-richat-pebble-tool-sites-are-a-separate-industry)

Still possible

AGAINST

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). No assemblage has a dated stratigraphy or absolute date [Evidence EVD0DCKW9A4ABX1]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DCKW9A4ABX1
```

Key

**EVD** 0DCKW9A4ABX1

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Proposed

[Session 1](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara/sessions/SES0DCKZYK2CKXF/session-1-the-eye-of-the-sahara-and-the-atlantis-claim) · 28 Oct 2026

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0DCKW9A4ABX1)