# Geophysical models favour a deep magmatic intrusion over an impact

> Modelling of airborne magnetic and satellite gravity data supports a deep magmatic intrusion rather than a meteorite impact as the origin of the structure.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara/evidence/EVD0DCKS7CAKNNQ/geophysical-models-favour-a-deep-magmatic-intrusion-over-an  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Eye of the Sahara and Atlantis](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara)Evidence

Evidence · Eye of the Sahara and Atlantis

# Geophysical models favour a deep magmatic intrusion over an impact

Modelling of airborne magnetic and satellite gravity data supports a deep magmatic intrusion rather than a meteorite impact as the origin of the structure.

Supported0

## What it bears on 1 answer

[The Richat is a meteorite impact crater](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara/answers/ANS0DCKRQK46MGA/the-richat-is-a-meteorite-impact-crater)

Still possible

AGAINST

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). Geophysical models favour a deep magmatic intrusion over an impact [Evidence EVD0DCKS7CAKNNQ]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DCKS7CAKNNQ
```

Key

**EVD** 0DCKS7CAKNNQ

Kind

Evidence

Tier

Supported

Proposed

[Session 1](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/eye-of-the-sahara/sessions/SES0DCKZYK2CKXF/session-1-the-eye-of-the-sahara-and-the-atlantis-claim) · 28 Oct 2026

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/EVD0DCKS7CAKNNQ)
