# The block carries a text in an Olmec script, recording language, probably logosyllabic.

> Most likely: The block carries a text in an Olmec script, recording language, probably logosyllabic.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/answers/ANS0CYBBYW22P76/the-block-carries-a-text-in-an-olmec-script-recording  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Questions](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions)[Cascajal block and Isthmian writing](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block)[Is the Cascajal inscription writing?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/questions/QST0CYBBXD674WZ/is-the-cascajal-inscription-writing)Answer

Answer · Cascajal block and Isthmian writing

# The block carries a text in an Olmec script, recording language, probably logosyllabic.

The block carries a text in an Olmec script, recording language, probably logosyllabic.

**Most likely** Answers **1** questionPublished0

## Where it stands

**Most likely** Its tests partly supported it: two pieces of evidence for, two against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

## What it predicts

- Signs recur in sequences and pairs more than a random arrangement of the same signs would give.
- Co-occurrence irregularities match spelling conventions known from logosyllabic scripts.
- Further inscribed Olmec objects share signs and sequences with the block.

## What would rule it out

- A shuffled-sign control shows the observed repetitions are what chance gives for 62 signs drawn from 28 forms, and no further Olmec text appears.

## Evidence 2 for · 2 against

[62 signs from about 28 forms include repeated signs and repeated sequences.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/evidence/EVD0CYBBZ3W695H/62-signs-from-about-28-forms-include-repeated-signs-and)

Supported

FOR

[Sign co-occurrence irregularities are consistent with logosyllabic spelling; a repeated PELT-PAW pair is…](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/evidence/EVD0CYBBZBP16KY/sign-co-occurrence-irregularities-are-consistent-with)

Suggestive

FOR

[No second Olmec text of comparable length is known.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/evidence/EVD0CYBBZVA0FM7/no-second-olmec-text-of-comparable-length-is-known)

Established

AGAINST

[The signs bunch without the linear layout of a script.](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/evidence/EVD0CYBBZKG3MCC/the-signs-bunch-without-the-linear-layout-of-a-script)

Suggestive

AGAINST

## The questions it answers

[Is the Cascajal inscription writing?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/cascajal-block/questions/QST0CYBBXD674WZ/is-the-cascajal-inscription-writing)

Most likelyThe signs are a ritual arrangement of sacred images in Olmec iconography, not a record of language

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). The block carries a text in an Olmec script, recording language, probably logosyllabic. [Answer ANS0CYBBYW22P76]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0CYBBYW22P76
```

Key

**ANS** 0CYBBYW22P76

Kind

Answer · hypothesis

Origin

Published

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/ANS0CYBBYW22P76)