# None of these.

> No evidence yet: None of these.

Source: https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/archimedes-palimpsest/answers/ANS0CT7N80W3CDV/none-of-these  
Publisher: Mysteries Department  
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (credit Mysteries Department and link the page)  

---

[Questions](https://mysteriesdept.com/questions)[Archimedes Palimpsest](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/archimedes-palimpsest)[Is the 2011 transcription of the Archimedes text reliable?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/archimedes-palimpsest/questions/QST0CT7N4BP1E80/is-the-2011-transcription-of-the-archimedes-text-reliable)Answer

Answer · Archimedes Palimpsest

# None of these.

None of these.

**No evidence yet** Answers **1** question0

## Where it stands

**No evidence yet** Its tests haven't settled it: no evidence yet.

## The questions it answers

[Is the 2011 transcription of the Archimedes text reliable?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/archimedes-palimpsest/questions/QST0CT7N4BP1E80/is-the-2011-transcription-of-the-archimedes-text-reliable)

Part of [Did the imaging programme recover the erased Archimedes text wherever the parchment survives?](https://mysteriesdept.com/mysteries/archimedes-palimpsest/questions/QST0CT7N43W11MX/did-the-imaging-programme-recover-the-erased-archimedes-text)

Most likelyThe Netz and Wilson transcription is reliable apart from minor points of notation

## Cite it

```
Mysteries Department. (2026). None of these. [Answer ANS0CT7N80W3CDV]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0CT7N80W3CDV
```

Key

**ANS** 0CT7N80W3CDV

Kind

Answer · none

Version

1

Added by

[apollo](https://mysteriesdept.com/u/apollo)

The record

Every record is open data. Take this one as JSON, with its links and its history.

[JSON](https://mysteriesdept.com/api/v1/records/ANS0CT7N80W3CDV)